Assisted Dying, Here's Where It...
News1 min ago
emplyment law
Good afternnoon.
I am writing this on behalf of a friend. The circumstances are that we was head hunted by an insurance company from a secure job. He signed a contract of employment with his new company and then left the previous company to commence his period of notice at home. Once released from his period of notice he joined the new company and commenced work. On his arrival at the new company he was asked to fill in some forms one of which asked details of his education. Not reading it properley he declared 3 'A' levels of grades A to C. but in fact he has two C grades and on D grade.(all passes). The HR department checked his details obviously and he was called in (after being employed for a month) and said he had provided false information and sacked him on the spot. His immediate bosses tried to intervene on his behalf unsuccessfully. he has performed well in his first month exceeding his targets fourfold and in a few days the company was due to pay him a substantial amount as a signing on bonus. I am not familiar with employment law. But the fact that it was a genuine error and he had already been employed and therefore was not trying to gain an advantage by deceit this seems unnecessarily harsh. Doesnt the law allow for Humans being imperfect and acknowledges mistakes can be made also the penalty seems very harsh under the circumstances. This is a young man and he is crushed by this. Is there any remedy he can pursue in law? Any help appreciated with thanks.
I am writing this on behalf of a friend. The circumstances are that we was head hunted by an insurance company from a secure job. He signed a contract of employment with his new company and then left the previous company to commence his period of notice at home. Once released from his period of notice he joined the new company and commenced work. On his arrival at the new company he was asked to fill in some forms one of which asked details of his education. Not reading it properley he declared 3 'A' levels of grades A to C. but in fact he has two C grades and on D grade.(all passes). The HR department checked his details obviously and he was called in (after being employed for a month) and said he had provided false information and sacked him on the spot. His immediate bosses tried to intervene on his behalf unsuccessfully. he has performed well in his first month exceeding his targets fourfold and in a few days the company was due to pay him a substantial amount as a signing on bonus. I am not familiar with employment law. But the fact that it was a genuine error and he had already been employed and therefore was not trying to gain an advantage by deceit this seems unnecessarily harsh. Doesnt the law allow for Humans being imperfect and acknowledges mistakes can be made also the penalty seems very harsh under the circumstances. This is a young man and he is crushed by this. Is there any remedy he can pursue in law? Any help appreciated with thanks.
Answers
1 to 10 of 10
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by aardvaark. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
On the penalty question I will get back to you. As regards the application form. He had been head hunted on basis of his reputation and had commenced employment so the application form was retrospective. Also he had overperformed in his first month and his immediate boses were horrified at the situation but HR rule.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
There is something strange about this. If he was head hunted the new company would require his services and would probably have asked him to complete an application form which would normally ask for educational qualifications at that stage, not after the employee has started employment. Was it a requirement of the job that the applicant must have three A levels grade A to C?
It is not unknown, I do not say it happened in this case, that a successful person in a rival organisation is offered a job and then dismissed to remove them from the market. But I would not expect any responsible organisation to act in this way. There is little remedy as the person involved does not have the qualifying period of service to make a claim to an employment tribunal and the no qualifying period gives very restricted reasons. The new employer would probably claim the dismissal under capability or qualification, which is one of the five potentially, fair reasons for dismissal even with the correct qualifying period.
It is not unknown, I do not say it happened in this case, that a successful person in a rival organisation is offered a job and then dismissed to remove them from the market. But I would not expect any responsible organisation to act in this way. There is little remedy as the person involved does not have the qualifying period of service to make a claim to an employment tribunal and the no qualifying period gives very restricted reasons. The new employer would probably claim the dismissal under capability or qualification, which is one of the five potentially, fair reasons for dismissal even with the correct qualifying period.
1 to 10 of 10
Latest Posts
Film, Media & TV1 min ago
Religion & Spirituality4 mins ago
Crosswords10 mins ago
ChatterBank12 mins ago