you see, that makes no sense...being related to someone does not mean they are obliged to keep you...i would not expect my dad to do that.
this is not temporarily putting me up for a few months...this is my home and has been fpr 15 years...
oot...so its fine for me to get my rent paid to some other landlord who is a stranger....?
what exactly is the difference? what does it matter who gets the rent?
if i lived elsewhere and he had someone else for a tennant...the outcome would be the same for me and him...we but both have rent paid...so seriously - whats the difference...
the difference appears to be only the paper work!
(kindly remember this post is not about the rights and wrongs of housing benefit...its about being related to your landlord)
by me living there free i would be depriving my dad of an income...thats his business
you see, its all knee jerk...you say its wrong, but your reasons amount to nothing more than "it just is"
and please dont spout the 'morally wrong' rubbish...as i say, the monetary outcome is the same as if he had strangers as tennants and if i lived in a house with a stranger for a landlord...morals dont come into it.
and the fact that my dad is 81 (not 90ish) means he cant afford to just give a house away unfortunately
your 'arguments' make no sense