ChatterBank0 min ago
the religious and capital punishment
80 Answers
I would like to hear religious peoples attitude towards capital punishment.
State sanctioned execution is obviously a contentious and contraversial subject at the best of times but Im more interested in the religious aspect of it.
If you are religious, what crimes would warrent death? Are there 'crimes' that your holy books once sanctioned death for that are no longer applicable? Would society be better of if we (in the western world) followed your religious laws concerning capital punishment?
Thanks.
(obviously, thread open to non religious as well...)
State sanctioned execution is obviously a contentious and contraversial subject at the best of times but Im more interested in the religious aspect of it.
If you are religious, what crimes would warrent death? Are there 'crimes' that your holy books once sanctioned death for that are no longer applicable? Would society be better of if we (in the western world) followed your religious laws concerning capital punishment?
Thanks.
(obviously, thread open to non religious as well...)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by nailit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Holy books sanction the death penalty for many perceived transgressions - but it seems in some cases it no longer applies. I don't know who changed God's rules though. It wasn’t him – well at least he hasn't admitted to it – and I can’t get an answer from the religious among us, so good luck with your question.
During the debate on the proposed abolition of the death penalty here in the UK the writer, Evelyn Waugh, made a very good point. "Few of us," he said, "are in the happy position of knowing the hour and date of our deaths. The condemned man is thus fortunate to have the opportunity to make his peace with God."
As we no longer live in a theocratic society laws, such as lapidation for people taken in adultery, no longer apply. It's not for me to say if that's a good or bad thing.
As we no longer live in a theocratic society laws, such as lapidation for people taken in adultery, no longer apply. It's not for me to say if that's a good or bad thing.
the Old Testament demands the death sentence for quite a range of people, including adulterers and mediums, which would be bad luck for Sally Morgan and Ryan Giggs alike. But Christ rather short-circuited this by suggesting that the penalty should only be administered by those who were without sin themselves. He didn't actually change the rules, just suggested a very limited number of people were fit to impose them.
As far as I can see, the death penalty is demanded by a great many ABers in cases that get their dander up, but they're seldom overtly religious ones.
As far as I can see, the death penalty is demanded by a great many ABers in cases that get their dander up, but they're seldom overtly religious ones.
The Old Testament is pretty robust on punishments ! But when was the last time Jews stoned a woman to death for adultery? St John's gospel has the story of 'the woman taken in adultery', which depends on that. Religions can be pragmatic, and reflect the times, so it seems that holy books can be 'reinterpreted' (or simply ignored !)..
-- answer removed --
Jno, nice thought, but it doesn’t work because it only applied to adulteresses, so he didn’t exactly short circuit the original law as you suggest. Where, for example, disobedient offspring are concerned, the law stands – unless, of course, someone else has changed it since then.
‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, let him be put to death'" (Matthew 15:4).
Evening Anlyn. :o)
‘He who speaks evil of father or mother, let him be put to death'" (Matthew 15:4).
Evening Anlyn. :o)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.