Crosswords2 mins ago
Who Owns The Contents Of A Skip?
27 Answers
If I see something I could make use of in a skip outside of someone's house, am I breaking the law if I help myself to it?
Answers
19 answers so far but not one of them seems to refer to the actual law! The Theft Act 1968 states: "A person’s appropriatio n of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest . . . if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriatio n and the circumstance s of it"....
20:33 Sun 23rd Jun 2013
-- answer removed --
Yup. It either belongs to the owner of the skip or to the person who put it there...in either case it doesn't belong to you so its theft. Having said that its a theft that loads of people get away with. years ago we had a skip when we moved. It was amazing. Every day I would put stuff in it and the next morning the stuff I had put in it would be gone and there would be other stuff in it. The next day that too would be gone and there would be yet other stuff in it instead.In the end all the stuff that we wanted to get rid of had gone into the skip and either stayed there or gone somewhere and we had it collected
When I was having the garden landscaped I put quite a few large paving slabs in the skip (well not me personally). There was a knock on the door and this guy asked if he could have them and I agreed.
He was so worried about someone else taking them that he left his poor wife guarding the skip whilst he fetched his mates to shift them.
He was so worried about someone else taking them that he left his poor wife guarding the skip whilst he fetched his mates to shift them.
But it doesn't cease to be the owner's property. They retain an interest in it and how it is disposed of.
The argument that the property had been abandoned by its owner (is 'res derelicta' in law) has been put before. In Williams v Phillips , some Corporation dustmen were prosecuted for theft of stuff left out for collection. It was argued that you could not get more of a 'res derelicta' than something put out for the dustman. The court held that the property was still owned by the householders until it was taken away , at which point it belonged to the Corporation. In the case of a skip the property is still the owners until taken away in accordance with their directions; thus you must ask them if you wish to take anything (after all, they may have promised it someone else)
The argument that the property had been abandoned by its owner (is 'res derelicta' in law) has been put before. In Williams v Phillips , some Corporation dustmen were prosecuted for theft of stuff left out for collection. It was argued that you could not get more of a 'res derelicta' than something put out for the dustman. The court held that the property was still owned by the householders until it was taken away , at which point it belonged to the Corporation. In the case of a skip the property is still the owners until taken away in accordance with their directions; thus you must ask them if you wish to take anything (after all, they may have promised it someone else)
I wouldn't take anything without asking anyway but it seems that according to the law, nothing is ownerless. Just googled and found that out. You still own it after you've chucked it in your skip and once the skip owner takes the skip away it becomes his and when it gets to the dump it belongs to dump owners. My trouble is not people taking stuff out of my skip but others filling it up before I have finished with it.
Psssst tony, got some nice pieces of wood to make some raised beds?
Psssst tony, got some nice pieces of wood to make some raised beds?
akaic you would be doing the 'owner' of the skip contents a service by making more space. I spotted a fairly large aquarium sticking out of a skip once, climbed up to fish (pardon the pun) it out. Owner leans out of window and shouts "Oi! we're sick of people dumping stuff in our bloody skip!" so I shouted back "I'm not dumping stuff, I just fancied this fish tank!" to which she replied "Oh, ok - sorry, help yourself!"
19 answers so far but not one of them seems to refer to the actual law!
The Theft Act 1968 states:
"A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest . . . if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it".
http:// www.leg islatio n.gov.u k/ukpga /1968/6 0/cross heading /defini tion-of -theft
So if you take something from a skip, genuinely believing that the person who placed it there wouldn't mind, you can't be convicted of theft.
Chris
The Theft Act 1968 states:
"A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest . . . if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it".
http://
So if you take something from a skip, genuinely believing that the person who placed it there wouldn't mind, you can't be convicted of theft.
Chris
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.