The problem with an issue like this - as evidenced in the previous thread which AOG kindly linked as evidence - is the public attitude to trans-sexuals.
It is very easy for those of us with little or no understanding of the issues involved to take a knee-jerk prurient stand and think that, because we find the notion of a sex-change either distasteful, or unecessary, or both, we can assume that it is not valid in this case.
As I see it, the punishment for murder is a prison sentence, which this person has received.
The law does not then bend to deny surgery which would be denied to someone else.
The punishment is prison, not prison 'and some other denial of rights which we tack on because we think this guy is a seedy con-merchant' - just prison.
So no, he should not be moved and should not be denied his operation, because he would receive it outside prison, and as i have observed, he ias already receiving the proscribed punishment for his crime - we don't get to add bits on because we think we should.