Quizzes & Puzzles51 mins ago
Using Ipod In Car
5 Answers
Is it illegal?
We know using mobile is. Assuming using radio isn't? How about ipod?
Not sure what the Law is on this, or Satnavs for that matter?
Would it be detailed in Highway Code?
We know using mobile is. Assuming using radio isn't? How about ipod?
Not sure what the Law is on this, or Satnavs for that matter?
Would it be detailed in Highway Code?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Chasingcars. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Most devices are covered by the general law that you must be in control of the vehicle. It seems to have been necessary to make a special case for a mobile but really there is ample law coverage for generally not messing about with gadgets etc without having to name every possible instance separately. For example someone was prosecuted for drinking a bottle of water fairly recently and there is no specific law about drinking from a bottle.
-- answer removed --
Largely to back up TTT's post . . .
Much of motoring law relates only to'general'offences, rather than to 'specific' ones.
For example, there's no specific law that says you can't drive on the right-hand-side of the road on a two-way street. If the police see you doing it they have to decide (along with the CPS) whether a charge of 'driving without due care and attention', 'driving without due consideration for other road users' or 'dangerous driving' is appropriate. (i.e. they can't actually charge you with "driving on the wrong side of the road" because there's no such offence). Consequently the milkman who makes his deliveries by driving his milk float down the right-hand-side of a deserted and well-lit road at 5am isn't breaking any laws (because his actions aren't 'dangerous', 'inconsiderate' or 'inattentive').
Prior to the introduction of the specific law prohibiting the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving, you could still be prosecuted for doing so if the police could show that you were therefore 'driving without due care and attention'. The new legislation simply provided clear rules where there was previously a somewhat grey area.
Similarly, the police (and CPS) have to decide whether other actions can be classed as 'driving without due care and attention'. There have been well-reported cases where drivers have been convicted of that offence for eating a Mars bar, or drinking from a can of Coke, while driving.
The CPS's own website also provides examples of some of the situations where courts have ruled actions to be illegal. They include "tuning a car radio, when the driver was avoidably distracted by this action" and "selecting and lighting a cigarette or similar when the driver was avoidably distracted by that use":
http:// www.cps .gov.uk /legal/ p_to_r/ road_tr affic_o ffences _guidan ce_on_p rosecut ing_cas es_of_b ad_driv ing/#a3 0
So fiddling with the controls of a radio, iPod or SatNav MAY result in a conviction IF the police/CPS can show that it means that the driving is failing to exercise due care and attention (but, unlike using a hand-held mobile phone, there is no specific legislation prohibiting such actions).
Much of motoring law relates only to'general'offences, rather than to 'specific' ones.
For example, there's no specific law that says you can't drive on the right-hand-side of the road on a two-way street. If the police see you doing it they have to decide (along with the CPS) whether a charge of 'driving without due care and attention', 'driving without due consideration for other road users' or 'dangerous driving' is appropriate. (i.e. they can't actually charge you with "driving on the wrong side of the road" because there's no such offence). Consequently the milkman who makes his deliveries by driving his milk float down the right-hand-side of a deserted and well-lit road at 5am isn't breaking any laws (because his actions aren't 'dangerous', 'inconsiderate' or 'inattentive').
Prior to the introduction of the specific law prohibiting the use of hand-held mobile phones while driving, you could still be prosecuted for doing so if the police could show that you were therefore 'driving without due care and attention'. The new legislation simply provided clear rules where there was previously a somewhat grey area.
Similarly, the police (and CPS) have to decide whether other actions can be classed as 'driving without due care and attention'. There have been well-reported cases where drivers have been convicted of that offence for eating a Mars bar, or drinking from a can of Coke, while driving.
The CPS's own website also provides examples of some of the situations where courts have ruled actions to be illegal. They include "tuning a car radio, when the driver was avoidably distracted by this action" and "selecting and lighting a cigarette or similar when the driver was avoidably distracted by that use":
http://
So fiddling with the controls of a radio, iPod or SatNav MAY result in a conviction IF the police/CPS can show that it means that the driving is failing to exercise due care and attention (but, unlike using a hand-held mobile phone, there is no specific legislation prohibiting such actions).