Quizzes & Puzzles4 mins ago
Common Assault Beating
How come I could not continue to post an answer from my last question?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Seeker14. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.To be very honest, on that day, when the police said to me I was under arrest for my husband has an injury. I said I didn't do anything or attack him. So did my husband. All I did was trying to grad his phone. May be it was caused by that. Little did I know for accepting responsibility of a totally unclear injury put me in such position.
It doesnt matter whether hubby confirms it or not. If it didnt happen like that - but both say it did - it is still perjury.
My reading of this situation is that Seeker and her husband had an altercation during which he decided to call the police. She went to grab the phone off him and it is thought at this point caught his face. To some extent, it is irrelevant whether she caused an injury or not at this time - the mere act of grabbing the phone is an assault. Indeed, there doesnt even have to be contact to constitute an assault (definitions here http:// www.cps .gov.uk /legal/ l_to_o/ offence s_again st_the_ person/ - note the difference between an assault and a battery).
Presumably she was then interviewed under caution and, as a result, offered a caution. I have no idea what she said in the IUC, but this will be admissible in Court. It's going to sound pretty odd if in the IUC she says "yes I went to grab the phone and must have caught his face with my nail" and then in COurt says "he cut himself shaving".
A canny prosecutor will charge this as an assault simpliciter.
My reading of this situation is that Seeker and her husband had an altercation during which he decided to call the police. She went to grab the phone off him and it is thought at this point caught his face. To some extent, it is irrelevant whether she caused an injury or not at this time - the mere act of grabbing the phone is an assault. Indeed, there doesnt even have to be contact to constitute an assault (definitions here http://
Presumably she was then interviewed under caution and, as a result, offered a caution. I have no idea what she said in the IUC, but this will be admissible in Court. It's going to sound pretty odd if in the IUC she says "yes I went to grab the phone and must have caught his face with my nail" and then in COurt says "he cut himself shaving".
A canny prosecutor will charge this as an assault simpliciter.