Quizzes & Puzzles79 mins ago
Male Partner Dies Intestate
And elderly lady friend of mine has been living (unmarried)for years with a friend of hers (met at school!). He has died and his children are claiming rights to his entire estate. Is this legal? does she not have rights as a common law wife??
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by tony1941. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.ere is a question a few down in which the following answer was given:
5. When there is no valid will (which, of course, includes the circumstances where a will has been invalidated through marriage) the laws relating to intestacy apply. They are explained in the flowchart here:
http:// www.man chester s.co.uk /Intest acy-flo wchart. php
or you can work through this:
https:/ /www.go v.uk/in herits- someone -dies-w ithout- will
6. As you'll see from the above links, the partner of a deceased person has, in the first instance, NO RIGHTS WHATSOEVER to inherit anything from them (unless they were actually married to the deceased person or in a civil partnership with them).
7. Under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, a person who has lived at the same address as a deceased person, as if they were their spouse, has the right to apply to a court to VARY the terms of their will (OR to vary the intestacy rules) in order to receive 'reasonable financial provision'. So, despite what I've written above, an unmarried partner of a deceased person MIGHT actually be able to receive an inheritance from their deceased partner. However the court procedure is COMPLEX and EXPENSIVE, so it's FAR better to get things properly sorted out before the death occurs.
5. When there is no valid will (which, of course, includes the circumstances where a will has been invalidated through marriage) the laws relating to intestacy apply. They are explained in the flowchart here:
http://
or you can work through this:
https:/
6. As you'll see from the above links, the partner of a deceased person has, in the first instance, NO RIGHTS WHATSOEVER to inherit anything from them (unless they were actually married to the deceased person or in a civil partnership with them).
7. Under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, a person who has lived at the same address as a deceased person, as if they were their spouse, has the right to apply to a court to VARY the terms of their will (OR to vary the intestacy rules) in order to receive 'reasonable financial provision'. So, despite what I've written above, an unmarried partner of a deceased person MIGHT actually be able to receive an inheritance from their deceased partner. However the court procedure is COMPLEX and EXPENSIVE, so it's FAR better to get things properly sorted out before the death occurs.
There is no legal recognition of Common Law Wife. The flow chart below shows how the estate will be distributed.
http:// www.hei r-tight -wills. co.uk/w p-conte nt/uplo ads/201 7/01/Ru les-of- Intesta cy-1-Oc t-2014. pdf.
She would need to see a solicitor to see if she has any claim on the Estate if he supported her financially, but it could work out expensive .https://www.birkettlong.co.uk/site/library/privateclient/trust/cohabitees_and_death_who_can_claim.html
http://
She would need to see a solicitor to see if she has any claim on the Estate if he supported her financially, but it could work out expensive .https://www.birkettlong.co.uk/site/library/privateclient/trust/cohabitees_and_death_who_can_claim.html
yup - no rights
as we all say on almost a weekly basis - to people intent on leaving oral instructions or a letter of intentions and wishing to be reassured that That is OK - it isnt
.
if she were dependent on the old boy
then a claim as described in Chris' para 7.
Ubasses says it costs moolah ( I am sure that is right).
Needs a solicitor, court case and judgment + money
ALTHO - the children may be tolerant of such a request.
Oh dear - and it could have been avoided by making a will.
As I get older and stupider - and people die intestate,
I have come to realise that a decent proportion of people who die without a will, have ... decided NOT to make a will. ( positive decision rather than forgetfulness)
in short she is completely and utterly .....
as we all say on almost a weekly basis - to people intent on leaving oral instructions or a letter of intentions and wishing to be reassured that That is OK - it isnt
.
if she were dependent on the old boy
then a claim as described in Chris' para 7.
Ubasses says it costs moolah ( I am sure that is right).
Needs a solicitor, court case and judgment + money
ALTHO - the children may be tolerant of such a request.
Oh dear - and it could have been avoided by making a will.
As I get older and stupider - and people die intestate,
I have come to realise that a decent proportion of people who die without a will, have ... decided NOT to make a will. ( positive decision rather than forgetfulness)
in short she is completely and utterly .....
If there is property ownership involved, hopefully they were ‘joint tenants’, whereby the surviving tenant automatically inherits the property – rather than ‘tenants in common’, otherwise his children will have a claim on is half of the property (or all of it, if he was the sole owner).
It is so important to write a Will to ensure that your estate is distributed as you would wish.
At a very young age (over 18) I wrote a Will – otherwise in the unlikely event of my death, both my parents would have shared my estate.
It is so important to write a Will to ensure that your estate is distributed as you would wish.
At a very young age (over 18) I wrote a Will – otherwise in the unlikely event of my death, both my parents would have shared my estate.
Bednobs has already quoted a big chunk of my answer on a previous thread but I'll direct you to the whole of it here:
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/Law /Questi on15991 38.html
The key points here though are that:
(a) the term 'common law wife' has no meaning in law ;
(b) if the couple co-owned their property as 'joint tenants' (rather than as 'tenants in common') the intestacy rules are totally irrelevant; the surviving partner AUTOMATICALLY owns the whole of the house ;
(c) the intestacy rules don't give a single penny of the deceased person's to the surviving partner ; but
(d) the surviving partner has the right to apply to a court for the intestacy rules to be varied, in order that she can receive 'reasonable financial provision' from the estate. ( https:/ /www.le gislati on.gov. uk/ukpg a/1975/ 63 )
This link provides some useful information about seeking such a court order:
https:/ /www.hu ghjames .com/se rvice/c onteste d-wills -trusts -and-es tates/i nherita nce-act -claims /
However the process can be lengthy and expensive. A good solicitor would probably approach the children of the deceased person first, to attempt to reach a satisfactory agreement which would prevent the value of the estate being seriously eroded by legal expenses.
https:/
The key points here though are that:
(a) the term 'common law wife' has no meaning in law ;
(b) if the couple co-owned their property as 'joint tenants' (rather than as 'tenants in common') the intestacy rules are totally irrelevant; the surviving partner AUTOMATICALLY owns the whole of the house ;
(c) the intestacy rules don't give a single penny of the deceased person's to the surviving partner ; but
(d) the surviving partner has the right to apply to a court for the intestacy rules to be varied, in order that she can receive 'reasonable financial provision' from the estate. ( https:/
This link provides some useful information about seeking such a court order:
https:/
However the process can be lengthy and expensive. A good solicitor would probably approach the children of the deceased person first, to attempt to reach a satisfactory agreement which would prevent the value of the estate being seriously eroded by legal expenses.
Yes, I didn't explain it fully- yes it avoids IHT now and means when his wife dies the estate benefits from both allowances. The main point i wanted to make was to question eddie's point regarding the reason for that Ken Dodd's death bed marriage. Ken Dodd almost certainly did this for IHT reasons (Doddy having the last laugh with the taxman) not to avoid an estate dispute
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.