Health & Safety liability/compensation doesn�t work quite as bednobs would have you believe.
Consider the following workplace scenario:-
Workers are provided with safety footwear and instructed by supervisors to wear them at all times while at work. The company has also sent each employee on a health & safety course, specifically dealing with foot safety at work.
Despite this, employees regularly flout the instruction to wear safety footwear at work, (are observed by superiors) and are not reprimanded for not wearing safety shoes.
An employee suffers a foot injury at work (while not wearing safety shoes), and sues the company for compensation. The employer�s defence would be that they provided safety footwear, instruction that it must be worn at all times � together with appropriate training.
By and large, the employers defence would fail � since they knew that staff were not following their instruction in relation to health & safety.
Each compensation claim would be assessed on its own merits, but in the above example, the injured employee might see any compensation cut by 10 � 20% for not following company policy. The lions share of the blame would be placed on the employer for not ensuring employees complied with the rules.
In your case, I would expect the company to be found liable 100%, since you informed them of the unsafe practice, and they encouraged you to continue.
I would advise you to seek advice from your CAB in the first instance, they may well involve the HSE (did you take more than three consecutive days off as a result of your injury?). It may be that you end up having to sue your employer for compensation.
Having indisputable proof that your superiors knew you were carrying stuff un-safely, may well be crucial to any compensation claim you might have.