Motoring9 mins ago
Injustice -new question
12 Answers
Just finished watching it and absolutely clueless as to what went on (in defence of my stupidity, I watched in little bits over a number of nights).
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sherrardk. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It featured a barrister who had moved with his family from London to East Anglia after he had a breakdown. The reason for that was that he defended a man who blew up a car containing (unwittingly) a young boy who died. He is a barrister that strongly believes in defending innocent people. He never took on a briedf that he believed was guilty or told him he was guilty.
He than stumbled across the aquitted defendent and realised he was guilty- in fact hecnfessed. He then shot him. The story line was then linked to his detection by a dysfunctional detective who kept all information in his brain. When he was about to reveal and arret theister his own domestic crisis ended up in his own death, and with it the knowledge of evidence he had pieced together.
The next link was his old friend fromyears ago who asked for his defence. He too claimed innocence and when he found out the truth Travis, the barrister shot him also.
It was left I believe making the vewer eieve he got away with the two shootings and that justice, albeit vigilante, was served - hence title 'Injustice'.
Personally I was rivetted. Brilliant drama.
He than stumbled across the aquitted defendent and realised he was guilty- in fact hecnfessed. He then shot him. The story line was then linked to his detection by a dysfunctional detective who kept all information in his brain. When he was about to reveal and arret theister his own domestic crisis ended up in his own death, and with it the knowledge of evidence he had pieced together.
The next link was his old friend fromyears ago who asked for his defence. He too claimed innocence and when he found out the truth Travis, the barrister shot him also.
It was left I believe making the vewer eieve he got away with the two shootings and that justice, albeit vigilante, was served - hence title 'Injustice'.
Personally I was rivetted. Brilliant drama.
Thanks Paul for the resumé. Whilst I enjoyed the programme and the acting was excellent I thought some of the plot seemed a bit weak.
How did he obtain the computer dredged up from the Thames? How did he manage to go through all of the CCTV footage to find the piece of the defendant throwing the computer into the Thames. He wouldn't have known where to look and that's without obtaining all of the CCTV tapes to vet them all! Having got the coputer would it have been operating for him to find the child porography on it?
I think it was necessary to suspend disbelief on a number of occasions, but it was very watchable.
How did he obtain the computer dredged up from the Thames? How did he manage to go through all of the CCTV footage to find the piece of the defendant throwing the computer into the Thames. He wouldn't have known where to look and that's without obtaining all of the CCTV tapes to vet them all! Having got the coputer would it have been operating for him to find the child porography on it?
I think it was necessary to suspend disbelief on a number of occasions, but it was very watchable.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.