ChatterBank1 min ago
Frankie Boyle - disgusting man
114 Answers
He is at it again ..............
http:// www.thi sisleic ...894- detail/ story.h tml
How long is it before this disgusting man is silenced and loses his career.... soon I hope! Anyone who laughs at his vile jokes must be as sick as he is. Judging by my local paper, most people here in Leicestershire, where Madeline lived, are outraged!
http://
How long is it before this disgusting man is silenced and loses his career.... soon I hope! Anyone who laughs at his vile jokes must be as sick as he is. Judging by my local paper, most people here in Leicestershire, where Madeline lived, are outraged!
Answers
well all that happened was everyone went on his twitter page to see what it said, so what difference doe sit make that it was posted here? - you cant expect people to join in in outrage if they have no idea what was said!
Ann did the right thing letting us see what her post is about.
its hardly a secret so i dont see what difference it makes to repost on here.
Ann did the right thing letting us see what her post is about.
its hardly a secret so i dont see what difference it makes to repost on here.
12:03 Tue 02nd Oct 2012
Frankie Boyle has been debated on this site many times.
His appeal boils (no pun intended!) down to this - there are a section of people who think that the unsayable and socially tabboo subjects make for a kind of entertainment - where people laugh, but with their hands over their mouths because of the shock of what they have heard.
I would personally have a serious look at my sense of humour if I thought FB was amusing. People 'laugh' as a release of tension - someone who has had a narrow miss in a car will often laugh as a reaction, but it has nothing to do with being amused.
There is a school of thought that nothing is tabboo, and anything can be made to be humourous if people choose it to be so - and that is the bedrock of Boyle's career, and the reasoning of his audiences.
The fact is, just because people will pay to see and hear something does not mean it is not morally repugnant to the vast majority of society.
You could apply electric shocks to puppies and get a paying audience for it - the means does not justify the end in a civilised soceity.
Thanks to our laudible approach to free speech, Boyle is allowed to say the things he does on stage and on DVD, and people are allowed to pay to indulge their pleasure at him doing so.
However, Channel 4, the last bastion of 'alternative' humour have cut all ties with Boyle over just this sort of statement, and he will not be seen again on mainstream tv any time soon.
I would defend Boyle's right to practice his trade as a commedian - but for me, and a larger majority than his audiences, he commits the cardinal sin for any commedian -
it's not that me makes deeply offensive and upsetting coments about vulnerable people in our society, it's simply that in terms of commedy, he is about as amusing as dysentry on a coach holiday. Frankie Boyle is not funny, which makes he raison d'etre seriously flawed and hopefully his time as as success if appropriately limited.
His appeal boils (no pun intended!) down to this - there are a section of people who think that the unsayable and socially tabboo subjects make for a kind of entertainment - where people laugh, but with their hands over their mouths because of the shock of what they have heard.
I would personally have a serious look at my sense of humour if I thought FB was amusing. People 'laugh' as a release of tension - someone who has had a narrow miss in a car will often laugh as a reaction, but it has nothing to do with being amused.
There is a school of thought that nothing is tabboo, and anything can be made to be humourous if people choose it to be so - and that is the bedrock of Boyle's career, and the reasoning of his audiences.
The fact is, just because people will pay to see and hear something does not mean it is not morally repugnant to the vast majority of society.
You could apply electric shocks to puppies and get a paying audience for it - the means does not justify the end in a civilised soceity.
Thanks to our laudible approach to free speech, Boyle is allowed to say the things he does on stage and on DVD, and people are allowed to pay to indulge their pleasure at him doing so.
However, Channel 4, the last bastion of 'alternative' humour have cut all ties with Boyle over just this sort of statement, and he will not be seen again on mainstream tv any time soon.
I would defend Boyle's right to practice his trade as a commedian - but for me, and a larger majority than his audiences, he commits the cardinal sin for any commedian -
it's not that me makes deeply offensive and upsetting coments about vulnerable people in our society, it's simply that in terms of commedy, he is about as amusing as dysentry on a coach holiday. Frankie Boyle is not funny, which makes he raison d'etre seriously flawed and hopefully his time as as success if appropriately limited.
I agree it is best not to promote him and his filth - but unless people see how he behaves then he cannot be judged. Firstly he should be banned from British TV, and refused a licence to perform live to the public.
Also prosecuted for defamation of character and impersonation of a human being.
Didn't the police recently arrest some individuals for offensive comments on networking sites? What makes this Boyle any different?
Also prosecuted for defamation of character and impersonation of a human being.
Didn't the police recently arrest some individuals for offensive comments on networking sites? What makes this Boyle any different?
-- answer removed --
> How long is it before this disgusting man is silenced
Never, so long as he continues to receive publicity like this, thereby keeping his notoriety alive!
I had not come across this latest addition to his repertoire, but now I know all about it from reading this thread.
I appreciate that you believe he ought to be silenced, but this isn't achieving that goal...
Never, so long as he continues to receive publicity like this, thereby keeping his notoriety alive!
I had not come across this latest addition to his repertoire, but now I know all about it from reading this thread.
I appreciate that you believe he ought to be silenced, but this isn't achieving that goal...
MarkRae - i don;t think Ann86 is looking to get FRankie Boyle silenced, she is merely opening a debate about his latest observation - which is ongoing on here.
I hardly think that counts as giving him publicity - so far no-one has defended him or admitted to financing his activites by seeing his shows or buying his DVD's.
I hardly think that counts as giving him publicity - so far no-one has defended him or admitted to financing his activites by seeing his shows or buying his DVD's.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.