they stick him in programmes because they think he is winning, a nice smile, engaging manner, oh little do they know. He had the same effect on me when watching the London Olympics, sick bag, and a rocket comes to mind.
I thought the BBC wasn't allowed to advertise, yet every main guest on the show is presented as having something or other the public are expected to lay out money for.
heathfield, they get around it, it's one of the reasons i wished that the licence fee was scrapped and they go legit like the other stations. They endlessly plug their own programmes, and other people's tat. Product placement in their programmes as well.
Rubbish and when they have that Evans on, I have to switch off or over - it becomes total garbage. He's up there with McIntyre et al in my book and I wouldn't mind sinking them in the nearest Bodmin Moor marsh.
Dear me, there appears to be a lot of vitriol for two fairly inoffensive TV presenters!
I thought he was great at the Olympics, a presenter who actually has experience as a top gymnast and genuine joy when the Team GB gymnasts medalled.
As for Alex Jones, marks out of 10? I'd giver her 1.....
What on earth is the matter with everybody? the one show has lots of interesting items on it, and why take such a dislike to somebody you don't even know, there is no need to be personal just because you dont like his/her presenting.
Oh gawd what have I started? I'm playing Devil's advocate here.I have nothing against the presenters of the show.I find that by trying to cram so much into a half hour show they don't get to interview their guests as well as they should.Which is why the show is for me leaning towards drivel.(em10)- You can't knock Matt Baker's contribution to Children in need surely? His Rickshaw challenge was laudable.