News1 min ago
Question Time
19 Answers
Just watching QT with, most unfortunately, Russell Brand among the panel members.
Two questions should have been put to the panel:
1. Why is Mr Brand such an obnoxious mouthy slob?
2. Why did the BBC invite him on to the show, especially bearing in mind his appalling behaviour in the Andrew Sachs affair?
Two questions should have been put to the panel:
1. Why is Mr Brand such an obnoxious mouthy slob?
2. Why did the BBC invite him on to the show, especially bearing in mind his appalling behaviour in the Andrew Sachs affair?
Answers
Being mouthy and obnoxious is usually a cover for having no talent.
22:07 Thu 20th Jun 2013
I thought his article on the riots was surprisingly insightful.
http:// www.gua rdian.c o.uk/uk /2011/a ug/11/l ondon-r iots-da vidcame ron
http://
-- answer removed --
I can't stand Russell Brand. It's nothing to do with Sachs-gate; I just never found him funny. But if there's one thing which will make me reach for the off-button on the telly quicker than seeing RB, it's the realisation that 'Question Time' is about to start; it's all so predictable. Perhaps RB was brought in precisely to ensure that there was at least one contributor whose input to the debate couldn't be known in advance?
Also, while I'm no great fan of RB, it's possible that his recent piece for the Guardian is one of the best articles that they've published this year:
http:// www.gua rdian.c o.uk/po litics/ 2013/ma y/24/ru ssell-b rand-pa rliamen t-illus ion
Also, while I'm no great fan of RB, it's possible that his recent piece for the Guardian is one of the best articles that they've published this year:
http://
Thank god it's now over.
It's a great shame about Mr Brand because, as has been said, he is probably quite intelligent. However his manner is such that I had to mute my TV whenever he spoke.
The reason the Andrew Sachs affair should continue to him is because his behaviour during that episode towards an eighty year old man was reprehensible. Any employer worth its salt (which BBC is not) would never allow the perpetrator to darken their doors ever again.
Thanks for all your replies. They gave me something to do when I had muted Mr Brand :-)
It's a great shame about Mr Brand because, as has been said, he is probably quite intelligent. However his manner is such that I had to mute my TV whenever he spoke.
The reason the Andrew Sachs affair should continue to him is because his behaviour during that episode towards an eighty year old man was reprehensible. Any employer worth its salt (which BBC is not) would never allow the perpetrator to darken their doors ever again.
Thanks for all your replies. They gave me something to do when I had muted Mr Brand :-)
-- answer removed --