Quizzes & Puzzles15 mins ago
Oh Dear
Answers
If Médecins Sans Frontières decides that making a political stand against the common sense activities of countries under threat of massive immigration, and to "cut off their nose to spite their face" by refusing funding that could be used to do good, then that is their peculiar choice to make.
Few like some of the pragmatic decisions one must take to create a best result, but it is either put up with it or get used. Some ends can sometimes justify some means especially when the means is to be charitable to one's fellow human beings.
Finance should be used to ensure those who have legitimately fled over a near border have a decent lifestyle in the circumstances. If Médecins Sans Frontières don't want this to happen then that is rather uncaring of them, but we can't force them to take the money.
Few like some of the pragmatic decisions one must take to create a best result, but it is either put up with it or get used. Some ends can sometimes justify some means especially when the means is to be charitable to one's fellow human beings.
Finance should be used to ensure those who have legitimately fled over a near border have a decent lifestyle in the circumstances. If Médecins Sans Frontières don't want this to happen then that is rather uncaring of them, but we can't force them to take the money.
I just have the perception, and I think it's a fair one, mamya, that the kind of, big-hearted, people who would welcome refugees would also be Remainers.
To know that the EU, after top-secret talks, are not only sending them back to possible death but supplying the ammo to kill them must make them a tad uneasy.
To know that the EU, after top-secret talks, are not only sending them back to possible death but supplying the ammo to kill them must make them a tad uneasy.