Will Starmer Have To Replace Lammy?
News1 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by potterfan3. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.potterfan3, I'd be grateful if you could explain where in my post it said that SG was "crap because it was Sci-Fi", or that I hadn't watched it.
1) I suspect that I have been an SF fan since before you were born.
2) I saw the original film at the cinema, and have watched every episode of the show from the pilot onwards.
The show has never been more than entertaining (if you want a truly Great - with a capital "G" - SF show, the current incarnation of "Battlestar Galactica" knocks spots off "Stargate") however, if you read my post (I know that it might be a bit more complex than JK Rowling's prose) you will see that I said that I thought that the current seasons of both shows had been a bit poor. The (un)smiley also indicated that this was disappointing to me.
By the way, whilst I have yet to make my mind up about "Weeds" (what I've seen so far has been merely "OK"), "Nip/Tuck" is a far better show than Stargate,
Alas, quality is no guarantee of an audience. If it was, we wouldn't have to suffer rubbish such as the likes of the various Z list celebrity shows and Big Brother, and shows like Firefly would never have been cancelled.
At least Sky are supporting shows like Nip/Tuck and Deadwood which have quality writing, even if the audiences might not be huge.