Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
For The Morons Who Think The Moon Landings Were Faked.....
110 Answers
watch "click" on the BBC this week. The usual "anomalies" explained, again, but some interesting new explanations demonstrating that it was actually more difficult to fake than to go there.
Answers
they were faked with the help of Stanley Kubrick,He's such a perfectionis t he insisted on film on location.
07:27 Thu 18th Jul 2019
//Jim easiest way to see if moon landings were real.. Buy a good telescope and have a look at the stuff they left u there!//
It would have to be a pretty good telescope. The resolution limit of the Hubble telescope (with its mirror almost 8 feet in diameter) is around 300 feet at the moon's distance.Nothing anywhere near that size was left behind. With a decent amateur telescope you may be able to identify the landing sites (if you had a lunar map) but that's about it.
It would have to be a pretty good telescope. The resolution limit of the Hubble telescope (with its mirror almost 8 feet in diameter) is around 300 feet at the moon's distance.Nothing anywhere near that size was left behind. With a decent amateur telescope you may be able to identify the landing sites (if you had a lunar map) but that's about it.
judge even the hubbke cannot resolve the largest item on the moon, I believe the smallest item that it can see is 141 feet:
https:/ /www.sk yandtel escope. com/obs erving/ how-to- see-all -six-ap ollo-mo on-land ing-sit es/
"Hubble's 94.5-inch mirror has a resolution of 0.024″ in ultraviolet light, which translates to 141 feet (43 meters) at the Moon's distance. In visible light, it's 0.05″, or closer to 300 feet. Given that the largest piece of equipment left on the Moon after each mission was the 17.9-foot-high by 14-foot-wide Lunar Module, you can see the problem." - standard explanation for those of us who regularly debunk the hoax eejits.
https:/
"Hubble's 94.5-inch mirror has a resolution of 0.024″ in ultraviolet light, which translates to 141 feet (43 meters) at the Moon's distance. In visible light, it's 0.05″, or closer to 300 feet. Given that the largest piece of equipment left on the Moon after each mission was the 17.9-foot-high by 14-foot-wide Lunar Module, you can see the problem." - standard explanation for those of us who regularly debunk the hoax eejits.
it may be circular but it looks flat as a pizza dish to me, Buenchico
https:/ /timedo tcom.fi les.wor dpress. com/201 5/12/na sa-eart h-rise- color-p hoto.jp g
https:/
Daft question, as I wasn’t around at the time, but I suppose they were strapped into their seats for the whole four days’ journey each way?
Also, didn’t they just about run out of fuel as they landed on the moon? How did they get back, then?
Any mods around ready to delete my posts if I look like an idiot? ;)
Also, didn’t they just about run out of fuel as they landed on the moon? How did they get back, then?
Any mods around ready to delete my posts if I look like an idiot? ;)
They were not strapped into their seats for the whole four days’ journey each way - only for the launch and re-entry / splashdown.
They did indeed almost run out of manoeuvring fuel - they had just under 30 seconds remaining before they would have had to abort.
However, the blast off the moon's surface was a different thing altogether.
They did indeed almost run out of manoeuvring fuel - they had just under 30 seconds remaining before they would have had to abort.
However, the blast off the moon's surface was a different thing altogether.
Photographs taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbit (https://www.google.com/search?q=lunar+reconnaissance+orbiter+photos&tbm=isch&source=univ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj15d6Jt7_jAhXiVhUIHTpBCHcQsAR6BAgGEAE&biw=1600&bih=799) prove beyond all reasonable doubt that the LEMs etc are still there. It's even possible to see the trail of the astronauts' footprints.
To go right back to the OP, TTT does have a way with words; that silver tongue must be the envy of all!. Just because someone doesn't think the same way as him, they must be morons. Subtle as a bucket of manure - in hot summer! Oh, and I only repeated things I'd read and seen over the years. It doesn't mean I believe them.
In 1642, a moron called Galileo put forward the preposterous belief that the Earth revolved around the Sun.
The authorities had persuaded everyone that the Sun circled the Earth. Challenging the obvious truth that the Earth was at the centre of the solar system was so naive, inane, ridiculous ... and such an affront to the truth put forward by the Establishment, that Galileo spent the rest of his days in prison.
And quite rightly so, because everyone knew that he was just a moronic conspiracist.
It seems that our hostility, towards those who challenge the Establishment viewpoint, may not have changed much in four centuries.
The authorities had persuaded everyone that the Sun circled the Earth. Challenging the obvious truth that the Earth was at the centre of the solar system was so naive, inane, ridiculous ... and such an affront to the truth put forward by the Establishment, that Galileo spent the rest of his days in prison.
And quite rightly so, because everyone knew that he was just a moronic conspiracist.
It seems that our hostility, towards those who challenge the Establishment viewpoint, may not have changed much in four centuries.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.