ChatterBank38 mins ago
Pitt-Jolie baby
Somehow the fuss these pair have created irritates me.
They had a baby, enjoy her but do not turn a one day old baby into an advertising trick to support fading acting careers.
Do you think its wrong to exploit this baby?
Answers
No best answer has yet been selected by David Black. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I have to pick you up on the faded film careers point. According to IMDB, Brad Pitt has one film on release, three in pre production and another three confirmed for 2006 alone. Seven films in six months is hardly the sign of a fading career. I would imagine his forthcoming role as Jesse James will be a blockbuster.
Angelina Jolie has made it known for years that she has little interest in the film business anymore and regularly turns down offers. Don't forget, she is an Oscar winner and one of the few actresses whose name can still pull in massive audiences.
I think the decision to raise money for charities is a creditable one. The paparazzi are going to take photographs of the infant regardless and the decision of this couple to pre-empt them seems sensible to me.
if they don't play the game with the paparazzi and allow pics to be taken, they will be hunted, chased, and hounded in order for one hack to be the first to sneakily get a picture, and sell it for a ridiculous amount as its the only one - that will be more hassle for them than to arrange an appearance for the baby at a time that suits them
best to get it out of the way, then the hack can move on to something else