Mojo 373 December 2024 Crossword Anagram
Crosswords0 min ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Scylax. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Surely you would make a better argument if you did not use your exaggerated figures.
Using your figures, without the No Claims Discount of 40% your premium of �5000 would actually be �8333.33.
Best case scenario for most insurance policies is that after a non-protected claim your NCD would drop back to nil with no further "accident loading" to the premium, thus making your next premium (forgetting annual price rises which are independent of claims) �3333.33 more expensive, which would not be the case if you paid the �20 (or whatever) for the NCD Protection.
Any "accident loading" added to your premium would need to be greater than �3314 for your scenario to be true.
Uh Uh.....I'm a bit sick of my own Q. already. I reckoned that the basic premium was that charged before deductions for NCDs. etc. Wrong again.
�5000 may seem beyond belief, by the way, but wait and see. I distinctly remember thinking that if petrol ever became �1 per gallon nobody, but nobody, would drive again. At �1 per litre we are still here. The only iniquity is that c.70% is tax for an impoverished Mr. Brown, poor soul.
It's about 25 years since petrol hit �1 per gallon (which is equivalent to c.�3.70 today using RPI, or 80p per litre) so in real terms fuel is 25% more expensive than a quarter century ago. Six months ago the cost of petrol was 80p per litre, so it is only recent events which have caused any disparity.
I mention all of this because I see no correlation between fuel pricing and insurance premium increases. In the last 5 years all increases in my yearly premium has been more than offset by me moving to another, cheaper provider and so I cannot really envisage my current �220ish policy rocketing to �5000 in the forseeable future... unless there is something you know that you aren't telling the rest of us.
I agree with you about fuel duty and tax. Back in 1975 virtually all of this revenue was spent on roads & public transport. Currently only around a fifth is now used for transport related expenditure, enabling Mr Brown to fill the coffers with the extra �30 billion raised from fuel.