Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Licence revoke
My Mate has been caught speeding at over 100mph. I have heard that if he doesnt attend court and doesnt send his licence in to the court he cant have his licence revoked, is this true??
Answers
1 to 9 of 9
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by fluffsri. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I assume you mean that he may be disqualified (this is not quite the same as having your licence revoked).
Magistrates can disqualify a driver for any offence which carried an endorsement. Their sentencing guidelines for speeding suggest that disqualification should be considered (instead of penalty points) for speeds in excess of 90mph (in a 70mph limit).
As you friend has presumably been asked to appear in court by way of a summons he does not have to attend. Whether or not he attends will not have an effect on sentence.
However, if the Bench are considering disqualifying him, they will adjourn the case (for probably 14 days) to give him the opportunity to attend.
If he does not attend on the second occasion the Bench will proceed to sentence in his absence. He will have been told in the adjournment notice that disqualification is being considered and if he does not attend he should assume that he has been disqualified unless and until he finds out that he has not.
If he is not thinking of attending the first hearing your friend may be advised to enter a guilty plea by post (assuming he is guilty). He should also send his licence (both parts).This will reduce his fine (but not any points or disqualification period) by one third.
Magistrates can disqualify a driver for any offence which carried an endorsement. Their sentencing guidelines for speeding suggest that disqualification should be considered (instead of penalty points) for speeds in excess of 90mph (in a 70mph limit).
As you friend has presumably been asked to appear in court by way of a summons he does not have to attend. Whether or not he attends will not have an effect on sentence.
However, if the Bench are considering disqualifying him, they will adjourn the case (for probably 14 days) to give him the opportunity to attend.
If he does not attend on the second occasion the Bench will proceed to sentence in his absence. He will have been told in the adjournment notice that disqualification is being considered and if he does not attend he should assume that he has been disqualified unless and until he finds out that he has not.
If he is not thinking of attending the first hearing your friend may be advised to enter a guilty plea by post (assuming he is guilty). He should also send his licence (both parts).This will reduce his fine (but not any points or disqualification period) by one third.
The question is not as ridiculously stupid as it seems, Postdog as there is a small element of truth to it.
Many drivers are not aware of the full range of penalties available to magistrates and may not realise they can be disqualified for what they may think is a �trivial� offence. Magistrates are therefore reluctant to disqualify somebody in their absence for an offence where a discretionary disqualification is available.
There are a number of reasons for this. Firstly, they are mindful of the fact that it is all the more difficult to prove that somebody knew that they had been disqualified if they were not there at the time the order was made. It has to be shown that they knew they were disqualified if a successful prosecution for driving whilst disqualified is to be made out.
Secondly, disqualification automatically invalidates any insurance that may be held. So in the same way as the driver may be driving whilst disqualified without knowing it, he may also be driving uninsured without being aware of it. This is not a good situation for potential victims of any accident he may have.
Lastly, believe it or not, magistrates usually like to hear both sides of any argument before imposing their sentence. Giving defendants the opportunity to appear enables them to give their version of events as well as explaining what effect any sentence might have upon them.
Of course, the line has to be drawn and if the defendant does not appear at the second hearing then sentence is usually passed anyway.
So it is likely that some sort of �urban myth� has built up surrounding this issue where people think if they do not turn up they cannot be banned.
Many drivers are not aware of the full range of penalties available to magistrates and may not realise they can be disqualified for what they may think is a �trivial� offence. Magistrates are therefore reluctant to disqualify somebody in their absence for an offence where a discretionary disqualification is available.
There are a number of reasons for this. Firstly, they are mindful of the fact that it is all the more difficult to prove that somebody knew that they had been disqualified if they were not there at the time the order was made. It has to be shown that they knew they were disqualified if a successful prosecution for driving whilst disqualified is to be made out.
Secondly, disqualification automatically invalidates any insurance that may be held. So in the same way as the driver may be driving whilst disqualified without knowing it, he may also be driving uninsured without being aware of it. This is not a good situation for potential victims of any accident he may have.
Lastly, believe it or not, magistrates usually like to hear both sides of any argument before imposing their sentence. Giving defendants the opportunity to appear enables them to give their version of events as well as explaining what effect any sentence might have upon them.
Of course, the line has to be drawn and if the defendant does not appear at the second hearing then sentence is usually passed anyway.
So it is likely that some sort of �urban myth� has built up surrounding this issue where people think if they do not turn up they cannot be banned.
1 to 9 of 9
