Motoring2 mins ago
Scottish Independence
I read on the news (26.05.11) that Scotland is to have a referendum on independence. An economic adviser to Alex Salmond has warned that Scotland would 'gain little' and, although 'economically viable', increased financial power within the union was more likely. I am not for or against - just trying to understand. In what way is that a warning and what would it mean in practice?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Coldicote. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.http://scotlandonsund...reaking-up.6776064.jp
He is warning that there isn't muched to be gained by full independence.
He is warning that there isn't muched to be gained by full independence.
-- answer removed --
timaria //they pay their taxes and receive their budgets how they choose to spend it it up to THEIR Government. // Their taxes do not cover their expenses, we do .
I don't know how it works now but for years for every pound spent by the local government it was matched by the central government, Also the government based the grants on the previous year , so the more you spent the more you got. If you saved money you were penalised the following year. This is the system which is applied to the whole public services.
In addition Scotland receives extra funds from us . I think it's 12% more than the English regions.
I don't know how it works now but for years for every pound spent by the local government it was matched by the central government, Also the government based the grants on the previous year , so the more you spent the more you got. If you saved money you were penalised the following year. This is the system which is applied to the whole public services.
In addition Scotland receives extra funds from us . I think it's 12% more than the English regions.
Mike, why can't we say, 'Maggie'? I imagine that many Scots...lots of English, too...still see her as the bugbear she indubitably was. In addition, there has of course, in Scotland's case, also been the risorgimento of the ScotNats. The main point is that Tories there are a truly endangered species and, for that, "May the Lord be thankit!"
I am right in my observation that in 1959 roughly half of Scotland voted Tory. They were losing ground long before Thatcher, for reasons which I have not yet researched. I distinctly remember, however, in 1963, when Harold MacMillan resigned as PM and was replace by Lord Home, there was a by-election pending in the "safe" Tory seat of Kinross and Perthshire. The chosen candidate, George Younger, was persuaded to stand down in favour of Home, so that he could have a seat in the Commons. Home was duly elected and wickedly satirised on the TV show TW3, which portrayed the electors of the said constituency as sheep. Younger was suitably rewarded with the "safe" seat of Ayr, and became Scottish Secretary. On Home's retirement the electors of the aforesaid constituency chose an absolute buffoon, Nicholas Fairbairn, who probably did far more to damage Anglo-Scottish relations than William Wallace.
wba, hope this works (you don't need the IMG on each end) http://i55.tinypic.com/2ic9jwi.jpg