Quizzes & Puzzles39 mins ago
Bank robbers dressed as nuns.
79 Answers
http://www.dailymail....hts-Chicago-bank.html
Surely they would have done better if they had worn Burkas.
/// Officers described the female suspect as a black woman, about 5’5 tall, wearing black boots, white gloves and armed with a semi-automatic pistol. ///
/// The male suspect is described as a black man, about 5’7 inches tall, wearing black-and-white gym shoes, black-coloured gloves and armed with a revolver.///
How did they know they were black, when they were both wearing masks and gloves?
Surely they would have done better if they had worn Burkas.
/// Officers described the female suspect as a black woman, about 5’5 tall, wearing black boots, white gloves and armed with a semi-automatic pistol. ///
/// The male suspect is described as a black man, about 5’7 inches tall, wearing black-and-white gym shoes, black-coloured gloves and armed with a revolver.///
How did they know they were black, when they were both wearing masks and gloves?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
JTH....you still haven't answered my question.
Many lesbians feel like a man dress like a man and want to be called by a man's name..........now I have never met you so do not know the circumstances,so in reference to AOG's inquiry and to mine and for future reference.......do you prefer to be called Sir or Madam?
One would reply would be helpful.
Many lesbians feel like a man dress like a man and want to be called by a man's name..........now I have never met you so do not know the circumstances,so in reference to AOG's inquiry and to mine and for future reference.......do you prefer to be called Sir or Madam?
One would reply would be helpful.
Sqad - i cannot understand why you have taken AOG's thread into entirely another direction, apparently deciding to defend his seriously unpleasant inference, and to pick a fight with Jack at the same time.
I see no issue at all here - Jack is a gay woman, but a woman first and foremost, and as such, is entitled to common courtesy from AB users, as are we all. AOG has chosen to make an unpleasant inference based, as i read it, on her orientation, and you have apparently decided to add to it by apparently being deliberately obstrructive.
If courtesy required, any woman should be addressed as 'Madam', and her orientation, or the finer points of its epxressioin are an irrelavent side issue. To appear to need information in order to align your form of address to a stranger seems decidedly odd, at best, and patronisingly sexist at worst.
i suggest you drop this line of conversation now before reports to the Ed. start flying in.
I see no issue at all here - Jack is a gay woman, but a woman first and foremost, and as such, is entitled to common courtesy from AB users, as are we all. AOG has chosen to make an unpleasant inference based, as i read it, on her orientation, and you have apparently decided to add to it by apparently being deliberately obstrructive.
If courtesy required, any woman should be addressed as 'Madam', and her orientation, or the finer points of its epxressioin are an irrelavent side issue. To appear to need information in order to align your form of address to a stranger seems decidedly odd, at best, and patronisingly sexist at worst.
i suggest you drop this line of conversation now before reports to the Ed. start flying in.
Well, well, well, I cannot believe what a turmoil can be started by a perfectly innocent statement.
Knowing how careful one has to be with words in this PC world, in case they are taken completely out of context, I added the words (or whatever the appropriate term is).
Seems this wasn't protection enough to stop Andy-Hughes from jumping onto it, but I don't know what it had to do with him, since JTH didn't take offence until his words stirred things up.
Thank you Sqad for once again coming to my defence, even taking into account the threat by Andy-Hughes who apparently would wish to censor you also, but I am afraid both of us are losing the battle fought against such persons who continually find perverted pleasure from picking up on my every word to try and and weave into them their own twisted interpretations.
But enough is enough, I will no longer play their rather silly childish games, I will no longer try and explain my real words against the lies and accusations that they attach to them.
But what I will do, against their lies, insults, false accusations, and all their other forms of belittlement, I will continue to enjoy my time on AB and post on whatever subject I please, not on the ones they would only like me to post.
Regarding what we should address JTH as, she herself has suggested, 'ignoramus' (an ignorant person). If she so wishes that's perfectly alright by me.
Knowing how careful one has to be with words in this PC world, in case they are taken completely out of context, I added the words (or whatever the appropriate term is).
Seems this wasn't protection enough to stop Andy-Hughes from jumping onto it, but I don't know what it had to do with him, since JTH didn't take offence until his words stirred things up.
Thank you Sqad for once again coming to my defence, even taking into account the threat by Andy-Hughes who apparently would wish to censor you also, but I am afraid both of us are losing the battle fought against such persons who continually find perverted pleasure from picking up on my every word to try and and weave into them their own twisted interpretations.
But enough is enough, I will no longer play their rather silly childish games, I will no longer try and explain my real words against the lies and accusations that they attach to them.
But what I will do, against their lies, insults, false accusations, and all their other forms of belittlement, I will continue to enjoy my time on AB and post on whatever subject I please, not on the ones they would only like me to post.
Regarding what we should address JTH as, she herself has suggested, 'ignoramus' (an ignorant person). If she so wishes that's perfectly alright by me.
Hurrah! There you are!
Not that it matters, but I don't think your explanation is genuine, but that is for me to think, and you to argue. i think you knew exactly what you were doing when you added your codicil, and if you now wish to adopt an expression of bemused innocence like a European footballer sything down an opponent, then do feel free.
I have no wish to 'censor' anyone, as you well know, I am a passionate defender of free speech and reasoned debate - but sqad's argument was getting more and more ludicrous as it went on - I think jack adopted the correct approach in simply being amused rather than upset.
I find no 'perverted pleasure' in 'picking up your every word' - really AOG you do have a somewhat inflated opinion of the effect of your words on me, or indeed anyone else on here.
You shall continue to enjoy your time and post as you wish, and amen to that.
I shall continue to pick up on points with which i disagree, and pointed jibes at other AB users - as i wish.
Have I doubly disappointed you again?
Not that it matters, but I don't think your explanation is genuine, but that is for me to think, and you to argue. i think you knew exactly what you were doing when you added your codicil, and if you now wish to adopt an expression of bemused innocence like a European footballer sything down an opponent, then do feel free.
I have no wish to 'censor' anyone, as you well know, I am a passionate defender of free speech and reasoned debate - but sqad's argument was getting more and more ludicrous as it went on - I think jack adopted the correct approach in simply being amused rather than upset.
I find no 'perverted pleasure' in 'picking up your every word' - really AOG you do have a somewhat inflated opinion of the effect of your words on me, or indeed anyone else on here.
You shall continue to enjoy your time and post as you wish, and amen to that.
I shall continue to pick up on points with which i disagree, and pointed jibes at other AB users - as i wish.
Have I doubly disappointed you again?
Surely you would be better employed in revisiting your 'Rapist' thread and humbly apologising to all of the women you have insulted and offended there rather than trying to score cheap points from me here ?
As a man who prides himself on his old-fashioned values, surely you would be desperately worried that you had offended so many 'ladies' ?
As a man who prides himself on his old-fashioned values, surely you would be desperately worried that you had offended so many 'ladies' ?
jack - AOG does not insult and offend people, they simply wilfully refuse to accept either his humour, his way of expressing his views.
That renders an apology irrelavent.
Of course. the fact that the number of AB'ers who have taken issue with AOG over the years is higher than for anyone else by a considerable margin simply underlines how misunderstood he is!
I think I must have quadruply (is that a word?) disappointed him now - I'm off to pull myself together and have a long thing about what I have said today.
That renders an apology irrelavent.
Of course. the fact that the number of AB'ers who have taken issue with AOG over the years is higher than for anyone else by a considerable margin simply underlines how misunderstood he is!
I think I must have quadruply (is that a word?) disappointed him now - I'm off to pull myself together and have a long thing about what I have said today.
Andy - AOG really does present himself as a most odious character.......
He appears to have a great deal of 'dignity' on which he likes to stand (short man syndrome?) and is utterly oblivious to the ridicule and opprobrium heaped upon him, in equal measure, due to his increasingly hysterical pronouncements.
I had thought better of him if he had had the good grace to apologise for his excesses, and the fact that he has not speaks volumes.
I thank you for your attempts to shame him into some sort of apology......however, he appears to be shameless.
He appears to have a great deal of 'dignity' on which he likes to stand (short man syndrome?) and is utterly oblivious to the ridicule and opprobrium heaped upon him, in equal measure, due to his increasingly hysterical pronouncements.
I had thought better of him if he had had the good grace to apologise for his excesses, and the fact that he has not speaks volumes.
I thank you for your attempts to shame him into some sort of apology......however, he appears to be shameless.
Easy now everyone.
Lay off Old Git.
Perhaps we should reflect on the fact that the current financial situation means that social services are having their budgets reduced for Home Helps, Geriatric Support and Drop In Centres. Residential Care Homes are facing financial crises.
By providing just one elderly person with hours of amusement writing funny things and getting all confused in an amusing manner is perfectly harmless and a public service AnswerBank can be proud of. It's probably some people's only interest in life and the only 'fun' activity they can still manage.
At least when these little people are tapping away at their computer asking their funny 'wind up' questions and trying to explain their peculiar old ideas they are not causing queues in the Post Office or filling up the doctors' waiting rooms.
So carry on Old Git. You're in the best place.
.
Lay off Old Git.
Perhaps we should reflect on the fact that the current financial situation means that social services are having their budgets reduced for Home Helps, Geriatric Support and Drop In Centres. Residential Care Homes are facing financial crises.
By providing just one elderly person with hours of amusement writing funny things and getting all confused in an amusing manner is perfectly harmless and a public service AnswerBank can be proud of. It's probably some people's only interest in life and the only 'fun' activity they can still manage.
At least when these little people are tapping away at their computer asking their funny 'wind up' questions and trying to explain their peculiar old ideas they are not causing queues in the Post Office or filling up the doctors' waiting rooms.
So carry on Old Git. You're in the best place.
.
No problem jack.
I find it significant that a large number of people - certainly more than for any other AB user - have crossed swords with AOG on occasions - surely that cannot mean that so many of us are argumentative - but that the common thread is AOG himself.
I refuse to get drawn into another protracted battle with him - it dignifies neither of us, but i will not stand by and see any other AB'er attacked without challenging him, whether it 'disappoints' him or not.
The last man who told me I disappointed' him was my father - a nasty mean-spirited hyper-sensitive egotistical violent mysogynistic bully - and I am sure any comparisons are purely coincidental and unintentional.
I find it significant that a large number of people - certainly more than for any other AB user - have crossed swords with AOG on occasions - surely that cannot mean that so many of us are argumentative - but that the common thread is AOG himself.
I refuse to get drawn into another protracted battle with him - it dignifies neither of us, but i will not stand by and see any other AB'er attacked without challenging him, whether it 'disappoints' him or not.
The last man who told me I disappointed' him was my father - a nasty mean-spirited hyper-sensitive egotistical violent mysogynistic bully - and I am sure any comparisons are purely coincidental and unintentional.
Latest Posts
ChatterBank42 mins ago
Crosswords53 mins ago
ChatterBank80 mins ago
ChatterBank87 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.