Shopping & Style2 mins ago
Should we be concerned also?
29 Answers
http://www.dailymail....s-divided-nation.html
This is what has been happening in England for years, but no think-tank or anyone else for that matter is prepared to address the matter.
This is what has been happening in England for years, but no think-tank or anyone else for that matter is prepared to address the matter.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.According to France's 1999 Census, 38% and 34% of male and female married immigrants, respectively, are intermarried. The highest intermarriate rate was for European immigrants, mainly Spanish and Italian, nearly 50% of whom have had intermarriages. 30% of North African immigrants and 20% of Portuguese immigrants have also had intermarriages. The lowest intermarriage rate was for Turkish immigrants, with 14% for married males and 4% for married females.[126]
http://en.wikipedia.o...acial_marriage#France
so with all these interacial marriages where's this divided nation?
Where's the failure of multiculturalism when people are marrying each other?
http://en.wikipedia.o...acial_marriage#France
so with all these interacial marriages where's this divided nation?
Where's the failure of multiculturalism when people are marrying each other?
well having lived in Paris, most of us gave a big wide berth to Porte Cligancourt and the North, especially around the Stade Nationale. And I have never felt comfortable visiting the Stade for rugby and soccer internationals, unlike the Parc des Princes......so postdog has good reason in posting what he did.
Not really
You saw a documentry and took it at face value
I wondered why?
Do you believe all such documentries?
Was this particularly convincing?
Or perhaps it reinforced existing prejudices you had.
We have a tendency to accept evidence for things we believe and ignore evidence for things we disagree with
And tend to refer to challanges to our prejudices as "stupid responses"
You saw a documentry and took it at face value
I wondered why?
Do you believe all such documentries?
Was this particularly convincing?
Or perhaps it reinforced existing prejudices you had.
We have a tendency to accept evidence for things we believe and ignore evidence for things we disagree with
And tend to refer to challanges to our prejudices as "stupid responses"
France has, actually, long had a problem with its Arab (as opposed to simply Moslem) immigrant populations, which have grown up as an inevitable consequence of the imperial legacy on its doorstep.
The problems are socal and cultural and specific to France. I think its exacerbated by racism on the part of the "indigenous" community as much as anything else. Basically, the attitude which says "your values are not our values". It works both ways.
Generally, in Britain we have been much more accepting of "foreigners", which is something we should be proud of, while being aware of the potential drawbacks.
The problems are socal and cultural and specific to France. I think its exacerbated by racism on the part of the "indigenous" community as much as anything else. Basically, the attitude which says "your values are not our values". It works both ways.
Generally, in Britain we have been much more accepting of "foreigners", which is something we should be proud of, while being aware of the potential drawbacks.
Well there are certainly problems in Paris if what some of my French colleagues say is anything to go by. I don`t know if we`ll eventually have the same problems here but I think if there are no-go areas in the UK, they`re not the Muslim ones. I could be more worried walking through some of the sink estates in this country that I would Muslim areas.
/// So why don't you outline six bullet points on the actions you would take, AOG, if, God help us, you were in Number 10. ///
Too late now, if you had asked this question 50 odd years ago, then perhaps we could have helped to solve some of today's problems.
1. All British passports to be considered void, on the granting of independence from British rule.
2. Limit immigration to include only self financing skilled persons.
3. Immigrants to learn English, and then to apply for British citizenship.
4. Ban on certain items of clothing that is alien to our culture.
5. No dispensations from the law of the land
6. Restrictions on the type of architecture, that is liable to change the face of English towns, cities and villages.
Too late now, if you had asked this question 50 odd years ago, then perhaps we could have helped to solve some of today's problems.
1. All British passports to be considered void, on the granting of independence from British rule.
2. Limit immigration to include only self financing skilled persons.
3. Immigrants to learn English, and then to apply for British citizenship.
4. Ban on certain items of clothing that is alien to our culture.
5. No dispensations from the law of the land
6. Restrictions on the type of architecture, that is liable to change the face of English towns, cities and villages.