Donate SIGN UP

Syrias cry for help.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 14:07 Mon 06th Feb 2012 | News
15 Answers
http://www.telegraph....ffensive-in-Homs.html

Taking into account the atrocities that are taking place in Syria, should we now attack Syria as we did in Libya?

Or should we follow China and Russia, and sit back and do nothing?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
You go first.......we'll be right behind you, honest!
-- answer removed --
Send in the EDL
Question Author
Much easier to have a dig at the messenger, that to commit oneself, it seems
Russia is still peeved off the way we tackled Libya. They agreed at the UN something had to be done but as it turned out to be regime change they felt let down.

So come the problem of Syria they won't be caught wih their knickers down and so oppose any resolution we put forward. You can't blame Russia really for acting the way that it has.
General AOG, Filed Commander, Syria.

The very thought makes the mind boggle.

Mind you, let's see AOG's reaction when we start receiving refugees from Hom and other Syrian cities. Bet he won't be that welcoming.....
Field Commander, not Filed Commander, though that may be more apropos....
Question Author
Good answer rov1100
The UK can no longer afford to get suckered into expensive foreign adventures.

We're the biggest net contributor to the EU - let them prance and posture while we deal with the real problems in this country.
We'd go if America asked us. ^^^
Venator where did you get that we pay most into EU? It took me less that a minute to see thats not true
*We'd go if America asked us. ^^^ *

or maybe told us ;)
We should do neither. Plainly "attacking Syria" is out of the question, but don't believe for one moment the Russia is "sitting back doing nothing". Tomorrow their foreign minister Lavrov visits Damascus where you may be assured that he will discuss with his friend and ally Assad how best to prop the beleaguered President up. Don't believe the nonsense about Libya: it's nothing to do with a genuine desire to avoid bloodshed (a bit late for that surely) but everything to do with desperately trying to preserve their many interests there.
Meanwhile the West and the Arab League are trying to do what they can in the face of the UN failure, but it's hard to see what they can do in the short term. Long term Assad, and Russia's interests in that country, are doomed (they are hated now by the ordinary, currently disenfranchised people, hardly susprisingly), and it is bizarre that they can't see that and try to cut their losses.
^^ Indeed

Russia will want an outcome where they retain their naval base in Syria

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Syrias cry for help.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.