Uk Economy Is Headed For The Worst Of...
News4 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by VINNY100_2. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.libertie,
Please remember I am VERY new to this site,and have yet to master it's "netiqutte".My two answers were NOT crass,my 1st merely asked (as a genuine question) why the girls were in the park.My 2nd answer just stated my feelings,that some of the answers in this thread frightened me( I have led a rather sheltered life) I feel sorry and upset if you think I live on another planet,but we are not all so "streetwise" as you obviously are!
PS I am certainly NOT unsympathetic,but trying to maintain a balanced outlook.
mystress. I don't think anyone was trying to attack you for your views. I agree that some of the posts on this thread have been deeply unpleasant including some - now deleted which were directed personally at me.
What people got upset about is that when you asked 'what were they doing there in the first place' it can be read as though you are implying that the girls' behaviour in some way contributed to what then happened to them. My view is that no matter how you behave you shouldn't be subjected to violence. Therefore the girls' behaviour is irrelevant.
I have found answer bank to be an interesting site with some really interesting posters. Please don't let this thread put you off. There are people who will disagree but usually in a fair debate. In this case I reported one post, and only one, for expressing racist views which offended me and break the answer bank guidelines. I then, to be fair, informed the poster that I had done this whist addressing his post. This opened me up to a lot of personal abuse which I can only assume others reported as it has generally disappeared today.
Answer bank has not in my experience usually been like this. I do hope we can all disagree in the future whilst remaining civil...
I thought mystress's question - what were the girls doing? - was a fair one. I read this morning that they had been seen around the massage parlour and the red light district before.
Does this mean they deserved to be attacked? No. Does it mean that there's a lot about this case we don't know? Yes. (I don't even know if today's report is true.) I want to know far, far more before I start stringing people up, and I don't think mystress should be criticised for querying the details either.
This thread is so similar to the hanging thread a couple of weeks ago - and has become just as heated. I made my feeling known on that.
I totally understand and agree with Didcot's sentiments in the posting above. If we want to go back to being uncivilised then we should be prepared to accept all the other things that go with it - and that might involve being thrown in jail and left to rot for stealing a loaf of bread.
Of course I would feel like killing and mutilating anybody that commited such noxious crimes against anyone I loved, but laws prevent it - fortunately. I can't believe either the comments that have been posted.
This crime was deplorable and sickening. Those that committed it should be jailed for LIFE, and I mean LIFE.
Didwot - I don't agree with animal testing, but I realise that some drugs/ chemicals do need to be tested before being 'released' upon the public. I think that criminals convicted of such hideous crimes could be used to be tested upon.
I don't think it is equal to raping, torturing and murdering a 16 year old girl and her friend. I think it's pretty tame compared to what others may think that the attackers deserve.