ChatterBank0 min ago
All Stand
21 Answers
Thrown out for not standing for the national anthem
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ ...engl and-tyn e-18141 421
Thrown out for being gay
http:// news.bb c.co.uk ...i/en gland/8 578787. stm
Similar or not?
http://
Thrown out for being gay
http://
Similar or not?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
I wouldn't have thought so, it's not illegal to not stand for the national anthem, (although you'd be a prize tit if you felt the way I did and went in to some mad monarchists tea room), however it is illegal to discriminate against people based on race, sex, age, sexuality, etc... so to me, not similar.
Not similar. Not standing for the national anthem is a choice you make. They decided they weren't going to abide by the rules of the establishment. Nothing wrong with that, but if you make that decision you have to accept the consequences.
Being gay isn't a choice, it's just who someone is, which is why it's wrong - and illegal - to discriminate against them.
Being gay isn't a choice, it's just who someone is, which is why it's wrong - and illegal - to discriminate against them.
They are similar in that the owner of each of the premises is enforcing rules or standards which they feel entitled - and in my opinion should be entitled - to do. There the similarity ends because the owner of the tea rooms will escape sanction but the owner of the B&B will almost certainly face prosecution, be obliged to pay punitive damages and may, depending on their circumstances, lose their livelihood.
New Judge is correct - and it makes me feel very happy indeed for a subsection of Christians to really know what it feels like to suffer a bit.
I mean - they've spent 2,000 years doing all they can to make the lives of gays as miserable as they can - time for them to taste a bit of their own medicine.
Christian philosophy and teachings are the reason why some gay kids try to kill themselves.
For this reason, I find it extremely difficult to summon up any sympathy for those who treat gays as second class citizens (because of their belief in magic mystical beings).
I mean - they've spent 2,000 years doing all they can to make the lives of gays as miserable as they can - time for them to taste a bit of their own medicine.
Christian philosophy and teachings are the reason why some gay kids try to kill themselves.
For this reason, I find it extremely difficult to summon up any sympathy for those who treat gays as second class citizens (because of their belief in magic mystical beings).
I considered it from the choice point of view the way that Ludwig did - interesting isn't it haow it's pretty unopposed that homosexuality is not a choice - wasn't always like that.
Then I thought about it from a different perspective
Support for the monarchy is a political perspective and she's enforcing that perspective on her customers.
If she'd ejected people because they were wearing Tory or Labour badges we'd probably think that was unacceptable - but then again probably cheer if she ejected BNP members
Then I thought about it from a different perspective
Support for the monarchy is a political perspective and she's enforcing that perspective on her customers.
If she'd ejected people because they were wearing Tory or Labour badges we'd probably think that was unacceptable - but then again probably cheer if she ejected BNP members
Jake, to address your National anthem theme, my annoyance over it is that it is geared to the Monarch. I am very Nationalistic, I love my country but I have no time for the sponging royals and no time for God botherers, so I have no anthem.
Perhaps one way to move on from this is to adopt an anthem with no God and no Queen in it?
Perhaps one way to move on from this is to adopt an anthem with no God and no Queen in it?