I refuse to look at pictures of funerals and the like. I seem to recall a discussion along the same lines some time back on here but my thoughts lie with your statement about intrudind on someones else grief.
I fully agree that the press should not go to funerals, it shouldn't be against the law but the press should give more consideration to the grief of the people at the funeral.
It is so sad that someone has started this fire deliberately and taken the life of so many innocents.
pdq1 - the parents weren't allowed to attend for security reasons. It would have turned the service in to more of a media service than it was, and the rent a mob would have been out in force, with possibly a vigilante or two.
Being in custody does nto necessarily mean you cant attend, however in this case it's probably best. Very sad of course if they are innocent.
As for rent a mob, i dont think this would happen. There are plenty of people who would demonstrate for free on a case like this, even if not guilty yet.
That has to be one of the saddest things I have ever read....not the article, but the descriptions of each child. So full of life and as has been said....lost, for what?
pdq1 "Mick Philpott, 55, and wife Mairead, 31, were left distraught when their request for compassionate leave to attend the funerals was refused on safety grounds."