Travel0 min ago
What planet do Our judges live on?
29 Answers
Burglary takes courage it seems!
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ ...engl and-tee s-19503 922
Latest outburst from one of M'luds! I just don't think that judges seem to have any idea what most of us must live with. Is it time to get some judges that have actually lived a real life?
http://
Latest outburst from one of M'luds! I just don't think that judges seem to have any idea what most of us must live with. Is it time to get some judges that have actually lived a real life?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by LazarusShort. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.It is well past the time we addresses the competence, relevance and political persuasion of our Judges.
This idiot probably thinks he is the bee knees and a cut above us all. But all ghe proves is that the judiciary are a bunch of hand wringing pinko do gooder not fit to sit on our Benches.
Lets hope they burgle him next time, he'll probably get the tea and cakes out for them, followed by a stiff port of course.
This idiot probably thinks he is the bee knees and a cut above us all. But all ghe proves is that the judiciary are a bunch of hand wringing pinko do gooder not fit to sit on our Benches.
Lets hope they burgle him next time, he'll probably get the tea and cakes out for them, followed by a stiff port of course.
How can you be critical when a learned judge makes a 'just' decision?
The unfortunate young man who appeared in court was only doing what comes 'naturally'; ie committing burglary to fund his heroin habit. It appears that Judge Bowers had 'noted' the burglar had kicked his drug habit earlier. Hang on, he supposedly committed this latest offence to so he could buy drugs.
A little confusing eh. OK so let's not be harsh on this young poor lad, he's obviously having a hard life. Especially following a three-year spell inside for arson.
A full 10 years inside would be a suitable outcome. And the judge? Well, what can we say? Maybe give him a knighthood.
The unfortunate young man who appeared in court was only doing what comes 'naturally'; ie committing burglary to fund his heroin habit. It appears that Judge Bowers had 'noted' the burglar had kicked his drug habit earlier. Hang on, he supposedly committed this latest offence to so he could buy drugs.
A little confusing eh. OK so let's not be harsh on this young poor lad, he's obviously having a hard life. Especially following a three-year spell inside for arson.
A full 10 years inside would be a suitable outcome. And the judge? Well, what can we say? Maybe give him a knighthood.
-- answer removed --
I can never understand why burglary is considered a minor crime.
We were burgled about 7 or 8 years ago, and they absolutely trashed our house - the insurance claim was in excess of £30,000.
That was the easy bit.
What they also did was systematically ruin beyond repair our photo albums, which included photos of our kids as babies and toddlers (this was before we stored our photos on our computer), spunked in Mrs Flop's underwear drawer, crapped in my daughter's bedroom and crapped in mine and Mrs Flop's bed (they made the bed after so that when we went to bed we discovered another of their presents).
It was as if in addition to nicking easily replaceable stuff, they also wanted to punish us.
The sense of violation was absolutely overwhelming.
This was a house we had strived for, having been Mrs Flop's favourite house when she was growing up, but the sense of violation was so great that within a month of the burglary she insisted we had to sell.
All the police were interested in doing was given us a crime reference number to report the burglary to our insurers because "it was probably just kids" The wealth of evidence the burglars left (turds and spunk) was ignored.
Kids or not, I would happily, even now, like to see the bastards dead.
This is why the comments from this idiot Judge sicken me.
Burglary is a heinous crime and should be dealt with severely.
We were burgled about 7 or 8 years ago, and they absolutely trashed our house - the insurance claim was in excess of £30,000.
That was the easy bit.
What they also did was systematically ruin beyond repair our photo albums, which included photos of our kids as babies and toddlers (this was before we stored our photos on our computer), spunked in Mrs Flop's underwear drawer, crapped in my daughter's bedroom and crapped in mine and Mrs Flop's bed (they made the bed after so that when we went to bed we discovered another of their presents).
It was as if in addition to nicking easily replaceable stuff, they also wanted to punish us.
The sense of violation was absolutely overwhelming.
This was a house we had strived for, having been Mrs Flop's favourite house when she was growing up, but the sense of violation was so great that within a month of the burglary she insisted we had to sell.
All the police were interested in doing was given us a crime reference number to report the burglary to our insurers because "it was probably just kids" The wealth of evidence the burglars left (turds and spunk) was ignored.
Kids or not, I would happily, even now, like to see the bastards dead.
This is why the comments from this idiot Judge sicken me.
Burglary is a heinous crime and should be dealt with severely.
couldn't agree more flipflop, vastly underrated and punished. If your lucky they just steal things but your experience is much much worse. Yet whenever there is a call to toughen up, you get the handwringing sort defending burglary as a minor crime. Personally I'd bang them up firts offence instead of waiting until they've done it 20 times. I'm amazed the police didn't want to use the DNA present to try and nab the the culprits.
i read this earlier, and wondered quite what planet the judge lives on. Having been burgled i could tell him that it's not a minor crime, but quite horrible and devastating. Came home to find items missing, house turned over, and nothing to be done, apparently there was a lot of homes that got burgled all at the same time, that was the policeman who finally showed up next day.
PLEASE CUT OUT THE VITRIOL AND SYMPATHISE with this vegetable, oops sorry, meant Judge! He is obviously a danger to others as well as himself. As such he should be examined by doctors and locked away under the special section of the mental health act - in short "sectionned". As for the fire-raising, drug-addicted but "courageous" burglar he is welcome to try it on at my house. Despite living an upright life I am now prepared to be branded a murderer and imprisoned but the thief will be dead - beaten to death - that will be one less of the vermin at least. I'm now beyond the end of my tether with these imbecilic/senile "judges", magistrates and their "do-gooder" supporters who INSTIGATE illegal acts and wouldn't recognise an honest citizen if he/she bit their ass.
If I publicicised what Judge Braindead said I would be summoned immediately for promulgating criminality!
SIQ by short name and sick of this LATEST "legal" disgrace.
If I publicicised what Judge Braindead said I would be summoned immediately for promulgating criminality!
SIQ by short name and sick of this LATEST "legal" disgrace.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.