Where is the outrage

[sp1814]

Avfew months ago, there was (appropriate) outrage at the Rotherham 'child grooming' story, which saw a number of men, of Pakistani origin sent to jail for having sex with underage girls.

However, there seems to be a suspiciously large chasm of silence about THIS case

http://www.dailymail....hange-sex-jailed.html

Why?

[FredPuli43]

Aog, you say that the media haven't covered the Rotherham story ,about a cover up, in The Times because it raises 'sensitive issues' with 'certain communities'. Out of interest, has the Daily Mail covered this, 'broadcast' it, or is that paper to be blamed for not acting because of 'sensitive issues' being raised'with certain communities ?. It's not a paper which shies away from such matters, is it?

[sp1814]

FredPuli43

Strange that isn't it?

I wonder why the Britain's biggest newspaper (taking into account it's online presence) has ignored this story.

And AOG - maybe the media is focussing on the missing schoolgirl, because the media in general isn't obsessed with slating Asians, blacks and Muslims at every opportunity?

Also, please note - the reason your name was dragged into this, is because you posted many many threads about the Rochdale case, but none on this, and despite what some may say - I honestly belueve that there are a number of similarities between the cases.

So it begs the question - where's the outrage?

[AB Editor]

Rotherham case still being discussed here: http://www.theanswerb.../Question1173121.html

There's more outrage in the Rotherham case because it feels like no one is being held to account and it appears there is a predictable police cover-up/incompetence duality at play once again? Maybe?

[sp1814]

AB Editor

Nope...I got it wrong again...I meant the Rochdale case - the Pakistani 'groomers'.

For some reason I keep getting Rotherham and Rochdale mixed up...

[anotheoldgit]

sp1814

If you had took the trouble to address my thread:

"Offenders were identified to police but not prosecuted, WHY?"

You would not have failed to notice that I also entered a Daily Mail link on the story.

Pass this on to FredPuli43 also.

http://www.dailymail....ng-wrote-herself.html

/// The news comes as research, reports and case files revealed police turned a blind eye to allegations of sexual abuse of white girls. ///

/// And it was claimed council officials were desperate to cover up any racial link to the abuse of young girls. ///

/// The research shows that a string of warnings dating back as far as 2000 were ignored by the authorities. In many cases, police action was taken only against the victims. ///

/// Among other alleged crimes which no one was prosecuted for was a British Pakistani man found in a car with a 12-year-old, a bottle of vodka and pornographic images of the girl. ///

Puts your image of a few white paedophiles somewhat into insignificance eh?

[anotheoldgit]

/// And AOG - maybe the media is focussing on the missing schoolgirl, because the media in general isn't obsessed with slating Asians, blacks and Muslims at every opportunity? ///

Are you for real? A school girl goes off voluntary with her teacher, news story, against a news story of accusations of cover-ups of sexual grooming of numerous under-age girls through-out the North, Midlands and Bristol.

It would seem by your own response you are also trying to cover this up, just because it happens to involve Asian Muslims.

[sp1814]

AOG

How on Earth could I 'cover this up'?

Seriously. Do you think I'm Paul Dacre?

I have no power to cover anything up.

[sp1814]

AOG

And another thing - how do you know whether this child went off voluntarily? What information do you have that the rest of don't?

[sp1814]

Lastly - I would very by wary of downplaying the crimes of white paedophiles.

I mean, remember that story of the nursery school nurse in the paedophile ring?

I actually know what they did to the kids (I have a mate who works for one of the nationals) - what we're talking about is abusing babies and toddlers.

It's pointless for us to go round and round about 'whose got the worst paedophiles' - because ALL paedophiles are rubbish humans.

[anotheoldgit]

/// Also, please note - the reason your name was dragged into this, is because you posted many many threads about the Rochdale case, but none on this, ///

I have already pointed out to you the reasons for this, and I don't intend to repeat myself.

/// and despite what some may say - I honestly belueve that there are a number of similarities between the
cases. ///

That is rather obstinate of you even the AB Editor has already pointed out to you the difference of the two cases.

There is only one similarity between the two cases that being;

They both involved sexual grooming of white under-aged young girls, by sick perverted older men.

[anotheoldgit]

sp1814

/// And another thing - how do you know whether this child went off voluntarily? What information do you have that the rest of don't? ///

Er! Perhaps these two CCTV images on the Cross Channel Ferry are a bit of a give away?

http://i.dailymail.co...005DC-677_636x451.jpg

/// These stills taken from CCTV camera footage filmed aboard a Dover to Calais ferry last Thursday show 30-year-old teacher Jeremy Forrest with his arm round runaway schoolgirl Megan Stammers in one picture and walking hand in hand with her in the other ///

[sandyRoe]

Aren't these cases similar in at least this respect, both involve middle aged men abusing young girls.

[anotheoldgit]

sp1814

/// It's pointless for us to go round and round about 'whose got the worst paedophiles' - because ALL paedophiles are rubbish
humans. ///

I seem to remember that, that is your favourite past-time.

Not being a paedophile I hasten to add, but to regularly state that most paedophiles are white.

[anotheoldgit]

sandyRoe

/// Aren't these cases similar in at least this respect, both involve middle aged men abusing young girls.///

Hence my earlier statement Sandy

There is only one similarity between the two cases that being;

They both involved sexual grooming of white under-aged young girls, by sick perverted older men.

[AB Editor]

"Nope...I got it wrong again...I meant the Rochdale case - the Pakistani 'groomers'."

I did wonder if I was going mad. Assumed the answer was yes and that I should plough on regardless.

[anotheoldgit]

/// Seriously. Do you think I'm Paul Dacre? ///

No he is professional enough to cover certain things up, but I am afraid even by your diversionary methods are not skilled enough to cover this up, but not for the want of trying.

[anotheoldgit]

sp1814

Not your day, it would seem.

[sp1814]

AOG

I'm afraid you've lost me - exactly what have I tried to cover up?

I'm sure the AB Editor will verify that their server has not been broken into, nor any files erased.

I don't have that power.

[bazwillrun]

"I'm afraid you've lost me - exactly what have I tried to cover up? "

in fact youve lost all of us....it was pointed out to you more than once numerous posts back how wrong you are, but to quote the Ab Editor you just "plough on regardless"

[Zeuhl]

^
baz

please clarify where the Ed accuses sp of 'ploughing on regardless'

that is a term the ed applies to himself