aog, the 'alleged' child abduction has simple facts, the basis of the evidence for the prosecution, which are agreed,; teacher goes abroad with 15 year-old girl and is arrested after big hunt involving the media, which naturally interests the public.No more of the evidence which the prosecution has is being given.
What more do you want to know about the Oxford case? What more is there to print? The men were arrested and charged, without any more. The prosecution's evidence is secret, which it always is now at committals, which are all formalities.And it remains so until the case is opened to the jury. Then the media can, and will give it wide publicity. Nobody will speak of the evidence, nor give any information, hearsay, or comments, which could prejudice the trial, before or during it.
We'll read all about the prosecution evidence when it's opened to the jury at the trial, and can make all our comments about how disgusting (or not) it is then, even before anyone has heard it given by the witnesses, then again when each witness gives it, then again if any of the men are convicted. then again on sentence, then again in response to media comments in the aftermath. That will be when it's all given wide publicity, when the media are allowed access to it all and allowed to report it.