Surprised to see this in the news section, to be honest - has something happened recently to revive it?
Otherwise, allegations of a conspiracy and controlled demolitions seem like zombie arguments to me - they just won't die and keep shuffling on :) 10 years on, no new evidence to support a conspiracy - quite the reverse, in fact. Just unsubstantiated allegation.
What was the conspiracy? Who was involved? Assuming it was a conspiracy, when did they place the explosives? How did they manage to plant the explosives without attracting any attention?
Why was there no evidence of explosives found during the forensic examination of the site(s)? Were all the 100s, maybe 1,000s of fire department and forensic personnel in on the conspiracy? How about all the independent laboratories who tested samples from the site?Which federal office was in WTC 7 that "contained all the records of the WTC conspiracy?"
You also have to consider the sources of information.I place little credence in allegations that shift and swirl and have no evidence base - allegations that stem largely from conspiracy theory websites.There are, around the globe with a human population in the billions, probably millions of structural engineers, all of whom have seen the videos, read the reports.If the conspiracy is true, and it was a controlled demolition, why are there not thousands of structural engineers clamouring for the truth?
And there has to be a genuine motivation for such a widespread, far-reaching, cold-blooded,expensive - expensive in terms of time, money, personnel, logistics- A tortuous, complex conspiracy and one hardly explained by any of the motives submitted by those doubting the consensus theory.
Quite apart from the distasteful notion that so many people within the govt would so readily conspire to murder 3000 civilians.
Those who assert a conspiracy are using zombie arguments, with no substance, in my opinion....