PRINCESS OF wALES??

[optomist]

Was it just me or did I hear , on the rolling news channel BBC, the reader refer to the 'arrival of the Prince and Princess of Wales.' yesterday.
About time too, I thought, and hope they won't be mealy mouthed about calling her Queen when the time comes...

[Brenden]

Ginger hair also runs in Diana's side of the family georgiesmum, but must say his facial features remind me of Hewitt.

[starone]

Harry does look like Hewitt. Pity we can't demand a blood test. Just imagine if he became king - which is possible, barely - we would have a commoner on the throne, unless he could prove otherwise. Might be good for us, come to think of it.

[Brenden]

Do you think we will be sent to the tower for treason starbuckone.

[Bazile]

Lets face it , Charles was not in love with Diana - it was a marriage of convenience , in order to produce heirs to the throne - simples .

Therefore , was it fair on a young naive young woman . to deceive her so?

[ummmm]

Looks nothing like Hewitt.

http://knowledgering...._prince_harry_2-1.jpg

[starone]

brenden - do you think they will be able to trace us. (hides behind sofa, panic-stricken).

[albaqwerty]

Mr A reckons Harry takes after Di's brother, wotsisfane Spencer.

[Baldric]

Interesting aside from a London based Midwife, at the time Camilla gave birth to her first child with, her first visiter/ person to hold the baby was Charles not her then husband Andrew.

[Baldric]

visitOr..............doh! ^^^^

[netibiza]

What's in a name?? She is still Charles' wife whatever title she does or does not use. I am all for it.

[netibiza]

alba, Mr N also thinks Harry is like Hewett, and there's no budging him!!

[albaqwerty]

Men are stubborn brutes at times Neti x :-)

Has anyone mentioned that when a man makes his mistress his wife, he creates a vacancy?

[BlueToffee]

God help us

[emmie]

that saying is often true, though one would hope that Charles doesn't go that route

[missnemesis]

I don't think he needs to em. If he had been allowed to marry Camilla in the first place and not been married off to Diana as a brood mare, which IMO is all she was, then everybody involved's life would be different. Like it or not they seem a genuinely happy couple and surely that should be enough.

[emmie]

fine, but i couldn't in all conscience think of her as the Princess of Wales, which is what the question is all about.

[anotheoldgit]

Wow, it is amazing that so many have condemned and criticised members of the Royal Family, who they have most likely never met or even know very little about.

I wonder if those that have issued condemnation of clandestine affairs and even in some cases accusations of certain young members of the family having different fathers, come from perfect holier-than-thou families?

Can they say that members of their families have never had affairs, or that they themselves have had only one partner who they have married and stayed loyal to?

It is fortunate that they weren't around when King Henry Viii was on the throne, they would have soon been whisked off to the Tower and had their head removed, for making such accusations.

[missnemesis]

Why not em? Diana wasn't the first ever Princess of Wales so when she married the Prince of Wales she inherited the title. Why should it be different for Camilla? She is married to Charles same as Diana was.

[NOX]

That's an interesting point Baldric- if Tom Parker-Bowles was in fact Charles' son then he has been legitimised by his parents subsequent marriage- (it's the Beauforts all over again for anyone who knows their medieval history).
I'd seriously laugh myself sick ;-/

[jake-the-peg]

Yeah - that didn't end well did it NOX?