Donate SIGN UP

Auld Lang Syne

Avatar Image
rich47 | 22:25 Sat 10th Nov 2012 | News
60 Answers
How disgraceful it was to hear Rod Stewart, who prides himself in his Scottish roots, getting the words of Burns marvellous song completely wrong.
Nowhere did the bard write "for the sake of" auld lang syne - it is "for auld lang syne".
When are you lot South of the border going to got it right?
Poor old Rabbie must be spinning in his grave every New Year's Eve when you guys make a mess of his beautiful anthem.
Please try this year to get it right.
Rich
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 60rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by rich47. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
A song's a song for a' that. He probably had to make it simpler for the sassanagh. :-)
You're wasting your time rich, they'll never learn, but let them enjoy themselves, I don't think they get out often :-)
Slainte!
Burns stated more than once that he simply copied the words that he heard others singing - that it is an old folk song.

Maybe he added words of his own, maybe there were many local versions as is the case with most traditional songs.

In any case there is nothing wrong with an artist adding his own flourishes.
When we undo the zip and let you go, you can have him.
>>>Nowhere did the bard write "for the sake of" auld lang syne

Given that he didn't write Auld Lang Syne anyway, it's hard to argue with that!

In a letter written in September 1793 Burns stated that he collected the song by noting it down from an old man's singing. Crediting Burns with writing the song is akin to crediting Vaughan Williams with creating the songs which he incorporated into his own works or even with crediting Cecil Sharp with the ownership of the thousands of English folk songs which he collected.
Rich, do you sing, 'For auld lang syne, my dear' or 'my friend' or 'my jo'?
^^^See what I mean rich?
Question Author
Thank you wharton - our man Burns wrote some beautiful songs, it is such great pity that our cousins below the border have no souls.
> Nowhere did the bard write "for the sake of" auld lang syne - it is "for auld lang syne".

I couldn't agree more! But this is by no means the only song whose lyrics Rod massacres...
Made a comment about this on the Remembrance Service thread. If he doesn't know the correct words then he shouldn't "sing" it.
I quite agree rich and hope you break free from the English yoke as soon as possibel....................
or even 'possible'
Question Author
The point is not that Rod massacred the lyrics but that the whole of Englandshire does every New Year
^^ True, but they don't go around pretending to be Scottish!
Question Author
At least Rod was weeping at the Celtic match
I'd weep if I had to go to a Celtic match...............
Why is this drivel in the news section?
Question Author
hc4361
there is a significant difference between the meaning of the words,
get a grip
Question Author
ludwig,
It may have escaped your attention but the remembrance celebration was headline news.
Just looked at BBC online rich - usually a fairly good source. No mention of remembrance or Rod Stewart anywhere.

1 to 20 of 60rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Auld Lang Syne

Answer Question >>