News0 min ago
Cyclist Killed By 'car-Dooring'
The defendent was found not guilty of manslaughter. He acted with undue care and attention - surely there must be some charge?
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-londo n-20725 496
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Booldawg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.baldric, I think sp means that when the door was opened, the driver wouldn't have been looking through the window and therefore the tint is immaterial.
This is true if he opened the door and looked behind him through the open door, but if he had looked in his wing mirror he would have been looking through the tint.
Geddit?
This is true if he opened the door and looked behind him through the open door, but if he had looked in his wing mirror he would have been looking through the tint.
Geddit?
baldric, which is what sp was saying about the tint not being a factor. It seems that the driver not only didn't look in his mirror, but flung his door open far enough to knock the cyclist off without looking behind through the open door first, which seems a bit foolish when you are parked in a bus lane.
"Mr Aydogdu, 32, of Hindhead, Surrey, said he had only opened his car door a little to see if anyone was coming."
Clearly he didn't.
"Mr Aydogdu, 32, of Hindhead, Surrey, said he had only opened his car door a little to see if anyone was coming."
Clearly he didn't.
TWR, if I'm honest, I'd always look behind me if I were parked in a bus lane. Not to look for cyclists, but so that the bus doesn't tear my door off.
It appears that this bloke clearly didn't look. Apart from that he didn't see the cyclist, the bus must have been close enough behind the cyclist to have made him not open the door - if he had seen it.
Booldawg, do you know the road in question?
It appears that this bloke clearly didn't look. Apart from that he didn't see the cyclist, the bus must have been close enough behind the cyclist to have made him not open the door - if he had seen it.
Booldawg, do you know the road in question?
Very sad indeed .
One of the things that scares me with cyclists is when they overtake on the inside in a queque of traffic . ( the lane in question being next to the kerb )
Your'e usually looking on the offside and would not expect them to come up the inside , so a slight move to the left ( still inside your lane ) could easily cause a collision ) .
I'm amazed when i see cyclists risking their lives , doing the aforementioned .
One of the things that scares me with cyclists is when they overtake on the inside in a queque of traffic . ( the lane in question being next to the kerb )
Your'e usually looking on the offside and would not expect them to come up the inside , so a slight move to the left ( still inside your lane ) could easily cause a collision ) .
I'm amazed when i see cyclists risking their lives , doing the aforementioned .
Parked his car 'next to a bus lane' suggests a lay-by as mentioned by jth, rather than in a bus lane
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -207328 83
http://
Goonermatt summed up what I meant precisely - however, but now thinking about the wing mirror...the tint would have had a bearing on the accident (if indeed he looked in it).
I have occasionally toyed with the idea of getting a bike or moped to get me to work in Kings Cross. A moped would reduce my door-to-door journey to about 10 minutes, but stories like this scare me off.
London traffic and bikes/mopeds are not a good fit.
I have occasionally toyed with the idea of getting a bike or moped to get me to work in Kings Cross. A moped would reduce my door-to-door journey to about 10 minutes, but stories like this scare me off.
London traffic and bikes/mopeds are not a good fit.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.