Technology0 min ago
Muslim Abuser Didn't Know That Having Sex With A 13 Yearold Girl Was Illegal.
48 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-22 68395/P aedophi le-groo med-vic tim-Fac ebook-c laimed- Muslim- upbring ing-mea nt-didn t-know- illegal -sex-13 -year-o ld-girl .html
/// Earlier the court heard how Rashid had ‘little experience of women’ due to his education at an Islamic school in the UK, which cannot be named for legal reasons. ///
/// In other interviews with psychologists, Rashid claimed he had been taught in his school that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground’. ///
Then one has to ask, shouldn't these Islamic schools now be closed down, if they are teaching such things?
/// Earlier the court heard how Rashid had ‘little experience of women’ due to his education at an Islamic school in the UK, which cannot be named for legal reasons. ///
/// In other interviews with psychologists, Rashid claimed he had been taught in his school that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground’. ///
Then one has to ask, shouldn't these Islamic schools now be closed down, if they are teaching such things?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Maybe citizenship classes should concentrate on things that matter rather than how to claim benefits. It seems its common practice for an older person to marry girls of 13 or less. Law should come before religion any time.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-22 00555/T he-Brit ish-chi ld-brid es-Musl im-mosq ue-lead ers-agr ee-marr y-girl- 12--lon g-paren ts-dont -tell-a nyone.h tml
http://
I dislike the notion of faith schools. They are held up as positive examples of diversity and multiculturalism iin modern day Britain, but, almost by by definition they promote notions of exclusivity and apartness, based upon their religion.
There are many reports of inappropriate teachings from faith schools. Whilst these examples are not exclusively from islamic schools, it does seem they are the worst culprits.
It is not sufficient,in my view for the DoE to simply accept the stated syllabus and stated intentions of the governors etc. We need to see far more spot checks and unannounced visits from inspectors to ensure rigour.
I haven't read the article in detail - but it sounds like a transparently desperate defence and should be dismissed as such.
There are many reports of inappropriate teachings from faith schools. Whilst these examples are not exclusively from islamic schools, it does seem they are the worst culprits.
It is not sufficient,in my view for the DoE to simply accept the stated syllabus and stated intentions of the governors etc. We need to see far more spot checks and unannounced visits from inspectors to ensure rigour.
I haven't read the article in detail - but it sounds like a transparently desperate defence and should be dismissed as such.
there have been a few Jewish schools to serve some of the roughly 300,000 jews in the Uk, i dont ever recall hearing of any problems like these islamic schools are producing.
Like i said earlier, these people and theyre religion are a blight on this country and it will cost us dearly sooner or later
Like i said earlier, these people and theyre religion are a blight on this country and it will cost us dearly sooner or later
-- answer removed --
"...by definition they promote notions of exclusivity and apartness, based upon their religion. "
Strange you should say this, Lazy, in view of your stance on the Gay Carnival, which apparently does not promote notions of apartness. But I suppose you will claim that this is different.
The CPS should appeal this decision as it is clearly "unduly lenient". (The sentencing guidelines suggest a custodial trm of four to six years for such an offence.
Strange you should say this, Lazy, in view of your stance on the Gay Carnival, which apparently does not promote notions of apartness. But I suppose you will claim that this is different.
The CPS should appeal this decision as it is clearly "unduly lenient". (The sentencing guidelines suggest a custodial trm of four to six years for such an offence.
@ NJ I am truly staggered. Are you truly trying to suggest that gay pride carnivals are as divisive as teaching fundamentalist religious views?
I think your logic circuits are seriously awry if so.
There is a huge difference between a bunch of people on the one hand celebrating their sexuality in a non-exclusive manner, welcoming all regardless of sexual orientation, in a clear reaction to decades if not longer of oppression, victimisation, abuse and more, and on the other religious fruitloops who wish to teach children that their faith makes them superior to others within society, or to reject or ignore scientific fact in favour of religious doctrine, or teach values stemming from religious beliefs that are at odds with equality issues.
If you could point to me supporting, lets say an educational initiative that promoted homosexuality, said hetersexuality was a sin for which they would burn in hell for an eternity, that their orientation was superior and mandated by god, and that other people who did not follow such teachings were somehow inferior - then you might have a point.
Otherwise it is just an example of poor logic.....
I think your logic circuits are seriously awry if so.
There is a huge difference between a bunch of people on the one hand celebrating their sexuality in a non-exclusive manner, welcoming all regardless of sexual orientation, in a clear reaction to decades if not longer of oppression, victimisation, abuse and more, and on the other religious fruitloops who wish to teach children that their faith makes them superior to others within society, or to reject or ignore scientific fact in favour of religious doctrine, or teach values stemming from religious beliefs that are at odds with equality issues.
If you could point to me supporting, lets say an educational initiative that promoted homosexuality, said hetersexuality was a sin for which they would burn in hell for an eternity, that their orientation was superior and mandated by god, and that other people who did not follow such teachings were somehow inferior - then you might have a point.
Otherwise it is just an example of poor logic.....
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.