Technology5 mins ago
Should The Us Second Amendment (Adopted In 1791) Be Scrapped ?
Here is an example of the sort of people who support the "right to bear arms" across the pond.
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/w orld/am ericas/ father- of-sixy earold- boy-kil led-in- sandy-h ook-mas sacre-h eckled- by-prog un-acti vists-8 471178. html
How cruel, insenstive, and evil.
http://
How cruel, insenstive, and evil.
Answers
i think that last point of zeuhls is the most telling. Shortly after the most recent spree killing in Newtown, an argument over guns and gun control started up in a barbers shop - culminating in one of the people in the argument becoming so enraged that they ran out to their car, drew out their handgun and sprayed the barbers shop with bullets. Fortunately, no one...
17:35 Wed 30th Jan 2013
Not an answer to your question, but an example of how insensitive Hollywood can be.
Yesterday I saw on the side of a bus an advert for a new film with Sylvester Stallone called "Bullet to the head".
And the advert features Stallone holding out a gun ready to shot someone.
No wonder the USA has gun control problems
http:// www.fox news.co m/enter tainmen t/2013/ 01/29/s hould-s tallone -new-mo vie-bul let-to- head-ha ve-had- its-tit le-chan ged-pos t/
Yesterday I saw on the side of a bus an advert for a new film with Sylvester Stallone called "Bullet to the head".
And the advert features Stallone holding out a gun ready to shot someone.
No wonder the USA has gun control problems
http://
i don't believe one should have a need to bear arms, but it is their country, whilst we can have an opinion, it would carry no weight.
The hecklers should be ashamed of themselves all the same.
just as an aside, i watched just a few minutes of a British drama,
on last evening called Utopia, it has had some acclaim, which showed a man in a school gymnasium, he first gun down a male teacher, then went into a classroom and gunned down the children within, though off camera also shot a lone little boy who was sitting in another hall, please tell me why they were allowed to show it, it was done so quickly, which i would imagine happened at the sandy hook school.
The hecklers should be ashamed of themselves all the same.
just as an aside, i watched just a few minutes of a British drama,
on last evening called Utopia, it has had some acclaim, which showed a man in a school gymnasium, he first gun down a male teacher, then went into a classroom and gunned down the children within, though off camera also shot a lone little boy who was sitting in another hall, please tell me why they were allowed to show it, it was done so quickly, which i would imagine happened at the sandy hook school.
because zeuhl, this was too life like, far too sensitive, and far too much, there doesn't have to be this level of violence on tv, it could have been implied, after all you don't see people getting their heads blown off in Morse, Midsomer murders, murder she wrote, or indeed in most dramas, there really is no need at all.
Except.... that it didn't happen that way (acutally no "heckling" happened at all):
http:// www.sla te.com/ blogs/t he_slat est/201 3/01/29 /neil_h eslin_f ather_o f_slain _6_year _old_je sse_lew is_heck led_by_ gun_rig hts.htm l
http://
Sure thing em
of course 'Midsomer murders' is more black-comedy than heavy drama,
'murder she wrote' is a kiddy show (and a poor one at that)
True though that Morse addresses some darker, adult oriented issues without explicit violence
/there really is no need/
The question isn't necessarily what is needed - I can't think of any serious drama where the creative process starts with 'what do we need to show?'
it's more likely 'what do we want to express?'
The most recent King Lear I saw had a particularly graphic eye gouging scene - not unlike Utopia
of course 'Midsomer murders' is more black-comedy than heavy drama,
'murder she wrote' is a kiddy show (and a poor one at that)
True though that Morse addresses some darker, adult oriented issues without explicit violence
/there really is no need/
The question isn't necessarily what is needed - I can't think of any serious drama where the creative process starts with 'what do we need to show?'
it's more likely 'what do we want to express?'
The most recent King Lear I saw had a particularly graphic eye gouging scene - not unlike Utopia
-- answer removed --
Sandy... apologies, I didn't see your earlier post:
"The 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified by 36 states on January 16, 1919, and took affect one year later, beginning the era of prohibition."
"While it was illegal to manufacture or distribute “beer, wine, or other intoxicating malt or vinous liquors” it was not illegal to possess it for personal use. The provision allowed Americans to possess alcohol in their homes and partake with family and guests as long as it stayed inside and was not distributed, traded or even given away to anyone outside the home."
Further "...It was one of the first acts taken by the Roosevelt administration to encourage changes to (and subsequently repeal) the 18th Amendment. It was a two-step process; the first was the Beer Revenue Act. This legalized beer and wine with alcohol content up to 3.2% alc/vol in April of 1933. The second step was to pass the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. With the words "The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed." Americans could once again drink legally and on December 5, 1933 the nationwide prohibition was over."
As an aside, the licensing of alcoholic beverage manufacture and sale is not left up to the indvidual States and several still have such "prohibition" on the books or at least counties within such States do...
"The 18th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified by 36 states on January 16, 1919, and took affect one year later, beginning the era of prohibition."
"While it was illegal to manufacture or distribute “beer, wine, or other intoxicating malt or vinous liquors” it was not illegal to possess it for personal use. The provision allowed Americans to possess alcohol in their homes and partake with family and guests as long as it stayed inside and was not distributed, traded or even given away to anyone outside the home."
Further "...It was one of the first acts taken by the Roosevelt administration to encourage changes to (and subsequently repeal) the 18th Amendment. It was a two-step process; the first was the Beer Revenue Act. This legalized beer and wine with alcohol content up to 3.2% alc/vol in April of 1933. The second step was to pass the 21st Amendment to the Constitution. With the words "The eighteenth article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed." Americans could once again drink legally and on December 5, 1933 the nationwide prohibition was over."
As an aside, the licensing of alcoholic beverage manufacture and sale is not left up to the indvidual States and several still have such "prohibition" on the books or at least counties within such States do...
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.