ChatterBank1 min ago
Should These Children Be Allowed To Stay In This Country?
45 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I do not think their genetic heritage would play any part in the determination of whether these kids should stay here or not common decency would say that the children should remain with their father wherever possible.
And the comment that most white south africans come from british stock is anyway factually incorrect. The majority of white south africans would trace their heritage back to Afrikaans stock (Dutch, German or French Heritage).
And the comment that most white south africans come from british stock is anyway factually incorrect. The majority of white south africans would trace their heritage back to Afrikaans stock (Dutch, German or French Heritage).
AYG
That cat story was bogus I'm afraid.
It was 'dailymailed' (real story had been twisted to suit the paper's narrative).
Then it gained currency and people took it as fact. You're in good company though...even Theresa May bought it.
The following link has a link to the judicial review and the real reason the leave to remain was granted:
http://
That cat story was bogus I'm afraid.
It was 'dailymailed' (real story had been twisted to suit the paper's narrative).
Then it gained currency and people took it as fact. You're in good company though...even Theresa May bought it.
The following link has a link to the judicial review and the real reason the leave to remain was granted:
http://
sp1814
/// That cat story was bogus I'm afraid. ///
On the contrary,
/// Last night, Downing Street sources were standing by Mrs May’s version of events – which was supported by the court papers from the original case in 2009. ///
/// While the cat was not the main reason for the decision not to deport the man, the pet was explicitly mentioned by the immigration judge, who said: ‘The evidence concerning the joint acquisition of Maya (the cat) by the appellant and his partner reinforces my conclusion on the strength and quality of [their] family life.’ ///
/// The case had been thought to have involved a man and his girlfriend, but in fact the judgement reveals that the couple are two gay men. ///
http://
/// The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal ruled that sending the Bolivian man back to his homeland would breach his human rights because he was entitled to a "private and family life", and joint ownership of a pet was evidence that he was fully settled in this country. ///
http://
/// That cat story was bogus I'm afraid. ///
On the contrary,
/// Last night, Downing Street sources were standing by Mrs May’s version of events – which was supported by the court papers from the original case in 2009. ///
/// While the cat was not the main reason for the decision not to deport the man, the pet was explicitly mentioned by the immigration judge, who said: ‘The evidence concerning the joint acquisition of Maya (the cat) by the appellant and his partner reinforces my conclusion on the strength and quality of [their] family life.’ ///
/// The case had been thought to have involved a man and his girlfriend, but in fact the judgement reveals that the couple are two gay men. ///
http://
/// The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal ruled that sending the Bolivian man back to his homeland would breach his human rights because he was entitled to a "private and family life", and joint ownership of a pet was evidence that he was fully settled in this country. ///
http://
FredPuli43
/// Was this a rhetorical question, aog , and you were amusing yourself by inviting us to answer it, fools that we are? Or did you seriously think the topic debatable? If the latter, please play 'devil's advocate' by presenting the opposing argument. ///
Unless you are unaware this site is called 'The AnswerBank' and one is allowed to ask questions, and what is the point of asking questions if one already knows the answer.
So I think it is most rude of yourself to suggest I am just 'amusing' myself by inviting others to answer it, and wasn't it you who labelled yourself a fool, not I?
And yes I do think this issue is debatable and that was my reason for presented it, but I do not have need to play 'devil's advocate' as I am quite capable of joining into the debate without doing so, just as I am doing now.
/// Was this a rhetorical question, aog , and you were amusing yourself by inviting us to answer it, fools that we are? Or did you seriously think the topic debatable? If the latter, please play 'devil's advocate' by presenting the opposing argument. ///
Unless you are unaware this site is called 'The AnswerBank' and one is allowed to ask questions, and what is the point of asking questions if one already knows the answer.
So I think it is most rude of yourself to suggest I am just 'amusing' myself by inviting others to answer it, and wasn't it you who labelled yourself a fool, not I?
And yes I do think this issue is debatable and that was my reason for presented it, but I do not have need to play 'devil's advocate' as I am quite capable of joining into the debate without doing so, just as I am doing now.
Latest Posts
The Other 9/11, 51 Years Ago Today.
History9 mins ago
ChatterBank12 mins ago
Crosswords20 mins ago
