Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Abu Qatada - What Now
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ric.ror. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Seriously
The existing evidence against this man seems very very slight - yet continuous home secretaries seem to believe he's a significant risk
I presume from this that they have additional evidence that they are not releasing.
If that is the case the Justice and security bill coming for its third reading will allow for him to be tried behind closed doors without releasing the evidence.
http:// en.wiki pedia.o rg/wiki /Justic e_and_S ecurity _Bill_2 012-13
I'd assume the plan is now (or should be) to keep him in the country and under observation until this bill passes and he can be tried in such circumstances.
Of course that's not a plan that could be announced in public as it might compromise the bill or the trial
The existing evidence against this man seems very very slight - yet continuous home secretaries seem to believe he's a significant risk
I presume from this that they have additional evidence that they are not releasing.
If that is the case the Justice and security bill coming for its third reading will allow for him to be tried behind closed doors without releasing the evidence.
http://
I'd assume the plan is now (or should be) to keep him in the country and under observation until this bill passes and he can be tried in such circumstances.
Of course that's not a plan that could be announced in public as it might compromise the bill or the trial
AOG
I think you're missing the point there
Osama Bin Laden was never in the US despite this his ability to harm them from abroad was so great they spent years searching for him abroad
The idea that you can kick a dangerous person out of the country and they can't harm you from abroad is beyond naiave!
I think you're missing the point there
Osama Bin Laden was never in the US despite this his ability to harm them from abroad was so great they spent years searching for him abroad
The idea that you can kick a dangerous person out of the country and they can't harm you from abroad is beyond naiave!
BTW I'm amazed about the number of people on here willing to advocate murdering somebody based on whatthey've read in newspapers.
Hey Ed - is advocating muder on a public website a criminal offence do you think?
These guys were all prosecuted for postings on Facebook
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -144880 55
Hey Ed - is advocating muder on a public website a criminal offence do you think?
These guys were all prosecuted for postings on Facebook
http://
jake-the-peg
/// I think you're missing the point there ///
No I don't think so, it was just you making confusing statements.
If you still cannot see it, let me explain.
You answered Baz when he stated;
"If we consider anybody to be a national security threat we should have the right to get them out of our country and keep them out."
by replying "Like the Americans did with Osama bin Laden?"
/// I think you're missing the point there ///
No I don't think so, it was just you making confusing statements.
If you still cannot see it, let me explain.
You answered Baz when he stated;
"If we consider anybody to be a national security threat we should have the right to get them out of our country and keep them out."
by replying "Like the Americans did with Osama bin Laden?"
personally i would release him into the community, not tagged but certainly kept an eye on, that way he will contact his followers and make a mistake, if he hasn't done so already, firm evidence of any wrong doing in this country and away he goes back to jail. You can't deport someone just because you feel like it. If he hasn't actually done anything wrong, at least that the public are aware of, what can the government do..
i heard earlier that the matter is still open and that they are not giving up on getting him deported, well good luck with that, as he has been here for 20 years.
i heard earlier that the matter is still open and that they are not giving up on getting him deported, well good luck with that, as he has been here for 20 years.
planet earth, unlike some of you, you can't deport him currently, and certainly not to Jordan, which in fact is the only place that wants him.
I don't want him or his tribe here either, but until he has done something wrong, a tangible piece of evidence that sticks out like a sore thumb, then he stays here.
I don't want him or his tribe here either, but until he has done something wrong, a tangible piece of evidence that sticks out like a sore thumb, then he stays here.
If he stands on a street preaching hatred , he can be jailed for that.Problem part-solved.
The mistake was to allow him to enter and reside here in the first place. The Home Secretary may refuse entry to anyone whose presence in the UK would not be in the public interest; not difficult to see that Abu Qatada's presence would not be and has not been. Having allowed him asylum because he couldn't return to Jordan, it's not all that surprising that finds an excuse not to be deported to Jordan to face trial.
Best course of action? Let him free and then nail him for some offence which is indictable. Bound to commit one. Then jail him.
The mistake was to allow him to enter and reside here in the first place. The Home Secretary may refuse entry to anyone whose presence in the UK would not be in the public interest; not difficult to see that Abu Qatada's presence would not be and has not been. Having allowed him asylum because he couldn't return to Jordan, it's not all that surprising that finds an excuse not to be deported to Jordan to face trial.
Best course of action? Let him free and then nail him for some offence which is indictable. Bound to commit one. Then jail him.