Quizzes & Puzzles69 mins ago
Abu Q Staying
// Court of appeal rejects home secretary's attempt to overturn decision to block radical cleric's deportation
The home secretary, Theresa May, has lost her latest legal attempt to deport the radical Islamist cleric Abu Qatada back to Jordan.
The court of appeal rejected her attempt to overturn a ruling by the British special immigrations appeals commission (Siac) blocking Qatada's return to Jordan to stand trial on the grounds that he faced a real risk of evidence obtained by torture being used against him.
The home secretary's appeal was rejected unanimously by three appeal court judges including the master of the rolls, Lord Dyson. //
Hey ho?
The home secretary, Theresa May, has lost her latest legal attempt to deport the radical Islamist cleric Abu Qatada back to Jordan.
The court of appeal rejected her attempt to overturn a ruling by the British special immigrations appeals commission (Siac) blocking Qatada's return to Jordan to stand trial on the grounds that he faced a real risk of evidence obtained by torture being used against him.
The home secretary's appeal was rejected unanimously by three appeal court judges including the master of the rolls, Lord Dyson. //
Hey ho?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ./They interpret the law in the right-on lefty liberal way that people like you Zehul(in the minority) love./
Yes
We continue to get our 'right on' way - good isn't it? I like it.
/Perhaps you would like to pay more taxes to support this man so those that dont want to dont have to. /
You're fussing about costs that are trivial in the overall scheme of things
Perhaps you should focus on what really matters such as upholding our long fought-for Laws and standards of behaviour
Yes
We continue to get our 'right on' way - good isn't it? I like it.
/Perhaps you would like to pay more taxes to support this man so those that dont want to dont have to. /
You're fussing about costs that are trivial in the overall scheme of things
Perhaps you should focus on what really matters such as upholding our long fought-for Laws and standards of behaviour
"The Appeal Court judges described him as a “very dangerous person”
jordan may have got evidence alledgedy gained by torture.
no proof of it whatsover (even if they did I couldnt care less)but these fools are happy to risk the lives of UK citizens over this scumbag
they should hold their heads in shame
jordan may have got evidence alledgedy gained by torture.
no proof of it whatsover (even if they did I couldnt care less)but these fools are happy to risk the lives of UK citizens over this scumbag
they should hold their heads in shame
Like I said on the other thread
If we have evidence against him that we can't use in open court then when the Justice and security bill becomes law he can be tried behind closed doors here.
I suspect that's the case because everybody keeps saying how dangerous he is and the evidence against him that we know about seems to rely on some pretty shady characters saying ' he encouraged me to do it' after they'd enjoyed the hospitality of the Jordainian Police.
(Frankly I'd imagine they's say Margaret Thatcher was the ringleader if they thought that'd get them off)
The last thing we want to do is kick him out of the country as a free man where he can just vanish
If we have evidence against him that we can't use in open court then when the Justice and security bill becomes law he can be tried behind closed doors here.
I suspect that's the case because everybody keeps saying how dangerous he is and the evidence against him that we know about seems to rely on some pretty shady characters saying ' he encouraged me to do it' after they'd enjoyed the hospitality of the Jordainian Police.
(Frankly I'd imagine they's say Margaret Thatcher was the ringleader if they thought that'd get them off)
The last thing we want to do is kick him out of the country as a free man where he can just vanish
Little England we may be zeul, and I like it that way. We don't want or need trash like Abu Q staying here. Once upon a time we could kick out all undesirables without kowtowing to anyone. No-one wants him here except maybe his hangers on who also need to be kicked out. I don't give a flying **** about who may torture him. It's torture having rubbish like him here. How much is he worth in 5 bedroomed houses and Benefits supplied by me and all the hardworking people struggling to make a living here, while spewinghis hatred for the West.
/Once upon a time we could kick out all undesirables /
Whe 'we' gran?
You?
Or the laws of Britain and Law Lords of Britain and 1000 years of rights, statutes and structures that we all live within - they are the authorities making these decisions gran
If you are not on their side, whose side are You on?
Whe 'we' gran?
You?
Or the laws of Britain and Law Lords of Britain and 1000 years of rights, statutes and structures that we all live within - they are the authorities making these decisions gran
If you are not on their side, whose side are You on?
And that's the problem with little Englanders - they think what's outside England can't hurt them
I don't believe Osama Bin Laden was ever in the US didn't protect them much did it?
If you kick him out of the country Gran and he helps bring down a BA flight what are you going to say to the relatives?
'Sorry but at least he isn't costing the tax payer money for a council house?'
BTW PML at half day closing for little Englanders! :c)
I don't believe Osama Bin Laden was ever in the US didn't protect them much did it?
If you kick him out of the country Gran and he helps bring down a BA flight what are you going to say to the relatives?
'Sorry but at least he isn't costing the tax payer money for a council house?'
BTW PML at half day closing for little Englanders! :c)