ChatterBank5 mins ago
Has The Welfare System Created A Monster?
120 Answers
http://
Do you agree that the welfare system, the concept of which at first was a blessing, has now created a monster, as has been shown in this tragic case?
It has created a completely different species of human being, as has been shown with the various individuals interviews over this case, they tend to have a different look from the norm, so much so that some are have even been given a name, 'CHAVs'.
These are not the usual 'poor', in fact there are many who live in council houses, (now called social housing) who may not be 'well off' but are decent hard working people, who not only take a pride in themselves but also tend to live to a certain standard of morals.
/// Philpott had also fathered another six children by three other women. As far as can be known, he never contributed so much as a penny towards the upkeep of any of these 17 children, all of whom were born into dependency on state benefits. ///
/// His story throws into surreal relief the row between the Tories and Labour this week about Iain Duncan Smith’s much-needed benefit reforms. While the Left and the Church cry that they are unfair and immoral, the Government argues calmly that what is immoral is leaving families such as Michael Philpott’s to languish on benefits for generations. ///
/// Indeed, Philpott never even attempted to find a job. The children owed their existence to his desire to milk the welfare system. ///
Do you agree that the welfare system, the concept of which at first was a blessing, has now created a monster, as has been shown in this tragic case?
It has created a completely different species of human being, as has been shown with the various individuals interviews over this case, they tend to have a different look from the norm, so much so that some are have even been given a name, 'CHAVs'.
These are not the usual 'poor', in fact there are many who live in council houses, (now called social housing) who may not be 'well off' but are decent hard working people, who not only take a pride in themselves but also tend to live to a certain standard of morals.
/// Philpott had also fathered another six children by three other women. As far as can be known, he never contributed so much as a penny towards the upkeep of any of these 17 children, all of whom were born into dependency on state benefits. ///
/// His story throws into surreal relief the row between the Tories and Labour this week about Iain Duncan Smith’s much-needed benefit reforms. While the Left and the Church cry that they are unfair and immoral, the Government argues calmly that what is immoral is leaving families such as Michael Philpott’s to languish on benefits for generations. ///
/// Indeed, Philpott never even attempted to find a job. The children owed their existence to his desire to milk the welfare system. ///
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
friedgreentomato
/// Can I point out that this 'man' was once a serving soldier - one of the so called hero'es amongst us. ///
One has come to expect such a sarcastic contribution as this, from the likes of you. You are a disgrace to your country by insulting our heroes in such a way.
This 'piece of garbage' was not a serving soldier he was a deserter, and in the past he would most likely have been shot for it, pity we don't still enforce this kind of punishment.
/// Can I point out that this 'man' was once a serving soldier - one of the so called hero'es amongst us. ///
One has come to expect such a sarcastic contribution as this, from the likes of you. You are a disgrace to your country by insulting our heroes in such a way.
This 'piece of garbage' was not a serving soldier he was a deserter, and in the past he would most likely have been shot for it, pity we don't still enforce this kind of punishment.
It's disgusting to say that we should shoot deserters. In the modern army people choose to be there, so running away is perhaps less understandable. When we were shooting deserters we were also forcing them to join the army whether they wanted to or not. Pretty poor show to think that we should have shot those who didn't want to fight.
-- answer removed --
>AOG: " Does this pair (humbersloop and factor-fiction) realise that in no way can pensioners be compared with the modern day benefit scroungers
>chaptazbru:"I'm sick of people picking on pensioners!"
I think AOG and chaptazbru have got hold of the wrong end of the stick about humbersloop's comment and my attempt to explain them to sqad
>chaptazbru:"I'm sick of people picking on pensioners!"
I think AOG and chaptazbru have got hold of the wrong end of the stick about humbersloop's comment and my attempt to explain them to sqad
-- answer removed --
//One has come to expect such a sarcastic contribution as this, from the likes of you. You are a disgrace to your country by insulting our heroes in such a way//
I do apologise if this came across as sarcastic it was not meant to be, but I did mean it!!
So I'm a disgrace to my country - why because I won't lower msyelf to see everyone as scum or a terrorist?
I do apologise if this came across as sarcastic it was not meant to be, but I did mean it!!
So I'm a disgrace to my country - why because I won't lower msyelf to see everyone as scum or a terrorist?
regardless of the fact he was in the armed services, no one seems to know for how long, if he was a deserter he would have been eventually caught. His record of abuse seems to be a very long one from early on, and i doubt being in the services had anything to do with that. he appears to be an abusive, cold hearted control freak, the women who he has lived with have more or less said this, including the poor young lass he almost killed, she was 17 at the time. I doubt very much this case has any merits to it, and when i said before that it was to do with money and was told it was to frame the ex, well that was also true, frame the ex, but also loss of benefits when the children went, he was looking to get the council for a bigger home, so more money in the pot.
Aha
So this 'piece of scum' wasn't produced by the Welfare State
He was produced by the British Army
Thanks for drawing our attention to that fact aog
Btw
You might want to update your assumptions
Any 70 year old pensioner would be born 1943 so served neither in ww2 or in National Service
And could have spent all their lives on benefits
So this 'piece of scum' wasn't produced by the Welfare State
He was produced by the British Army
Thanks for drawing our attention to that fact aog
Btw
You might want to update your assumptions
Any 70 year old pensioner would be born 1943 so served neither in ww2 or in National Service
And could have spent all their lives on benefits
indeed..
National Service ended gradually from 1957. It was decided that those born on or after 1 October 1939 would not be required, but conscription continued for those born earlier whose call-up had been delayed for any reason. In November 1960 the last men entered service, as call-ups formally ended on 31 December 1960, and the last National Servicemen left the Armed Forces in May 1963.
Currently, the British Overseas Territory of Bermuda practises conscription. This makes the Bermuda Regiment the only conscripted force still under the British Crown.
National Service ended gradually from 1957. It was decided that those born on or after 1 October 1939 would not be required, but conscription continued for those born earlier whose call-up had been delayed for any reason. In November 1960 the last men entered service, as call-ups formally ended on 31 December 1960, and the last National Servicemen left the Armed Forces in May 1963.
Currently, the British Overseas Territory of Bermuda practises conscription. This makes the Bermuda Regiment the only conscripted force still under the British Crown.
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles7 mins ago
Food & Drink14 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles14 mins ago
ChatterBank49 mins ago