^
because in certain circumstances they could be kept in for the full 17 and if they are let out on licence, that means that any type of infraction results in an automatic and immediate return to gaol
Apologies not the trial the lead up to in and the questioning - he so wanted to keep them away from Rose and when she snubbed him at one of the pretrial hearings he went to pieces - his love for her was that great!
I already understand some of the USA system, if you care to look at the last question i posted. That is not the only reason either. The one thing about their system is life generally means life, and three strikes and you are out.
Em10, I'm not sure where you have the idea that a life sentence in the US means a life sentence. They have a similar system in most states where there is a minimum term before the potential for parole.
and the sad thing about usa incarceration is the inflexibility:
teenagers gaoled for life for dreadful murders are - in some cases- completely transformed, remorseful and capable of leading productive lives by the time they reach their thirties but know they will never be let out
Zeuhl I don't know that much about the US justice system, but I've done a bit of searching at it appears that in some states there are "life sentences without the possibility of parole" (a bit like our whole life tariff) and "life sentences with a minimum term". It varies from state to state though. And of course, some states have the death penalty.
zeuhl, one would say a truly disproportionate amount for one section of society in the USA, which incarcerates more of it's citizens than any other nation on the planet.
if you look at my last posted question, gives you a flavour of how they run things, or don't. The land of the free, home of the brave, can't remember, it's been a while since i was there, but they didn't really mean it did they.