Donate SIGN UP

Disrespectful Cartoon.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 13:29 Wed 10th Apr 2013 | News
55 Answers
http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article8566635.ece/ALTERNATES/w620/Daily-cartoon-20130410.jpg

Would disrespectful cartoons such as this be allowed if other political dignities such as Nelson Mandela happened to die?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 55rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Yes.
Nelson Mandela is not perceived as divisive, but divisiveness is not the point of the cartoon. The point is that Mrs Thatcher did like the state, or local government, being in ownership or direct control of industries. Therefore, her wish, put one way, would be that her own funeral would be entirely in the hands of private companies, the best offer, and preferably the cheapest one, being accepted. As it happens, rubbish collection was something which local authorities dealt with by putting collection out to private tender. So, there's a juxtaposition in the cartoon.

And so there's nothing offensive in the cartoon, seen that way.
;-( ..not nice !
Would disrespectful cartoons such as this be allowed if other political dignities such as Nelson Mandela happened to die?

It's a moot point, because Nelson Mandela, like Mother Theresa and Dr Martin Luther King, are almost universally respected.

Baroness Thatcher, whichever way you lean politically, was an extremely divisive character.

There are many people who genuinely hate her.

I don't think you could say the same for Nelson Mandela (unless of course, you're someone who hankers for the days of apartheid).
It's another in a vv long line of starical political cartoons, and stands on its own on its merits, whether the reader agrees with the statement doesn't detract from the argument extolled by the cartoon.
"did NOT like the state... ^ !
AOG

FredPuli43's answer hits the nail on the head.

You don't even need to bother reading mine.
I find it amusing and hits the nail squarely on the head.
sp 14:40 well put.

I think it's funny.
I'm fairly ambivalent about Baroness T. she did some good things and some bad, I just think the cartoon fails because it isn't really funny, it didn't make me smile even.
What a bizarre world some people live in where political cartoons are expected to be 'respectful'!

Or may not be 'allowed' (whatever that means)

-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Methyl....I don't recall Edward heath being attacked so vehemently upon his death....do you ??....was he not more responsible ..?
. . . but she finished them off!
/She wasn't even Prime Minister during the Winter of Discontent/

the cartoon makes no reference to the WoD

it alludes to the privatising of 'state' services to the lowest bidder and a subsequent lowering of standards

as a subtext, it appears that the private contractor has an old coal mine to use for body disposals
I didn't like Mrs T Because of the amount of people she caused to lose their livelihood, but I agree with you aog that is totally disgusting & OTT. There is absolutely no need for cartoons like that & I for one would like to see the person responsible prosecuted.

WR.
-- answer removed --
My only criticsm of this is that it's derivative - looks like a Steve Bell cartoon

I prefer his offering

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2013/4/8/1365456662820/Steve-Bell-09.03.2013-013.jpg

1 to 20 of 55rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Disrespectful Cartoon.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.