Motoring0 min ago
Would This Man Be Allowed To Say Such Things In The Uk?
26 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Or for that fact would a rail firm be allowed to do this?
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/w orld/mi ddle-ea st/fren ch-rail way-com pany-sn cf-accu sed-of- banning -black- and-asi an-empl oyees-d uring-v isit-of -israel i-presi dent-sh imon-pe res-857 5245.ht ml
http://
But then?
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/crime /liberi an-man- claims- he-wasn t-offer ed-a-jo b-by-vi rgin-at lantic- because -of-his -africa n-name- 8574200 .html
Hey, I really must stop reading the Independent.
http://
Hey, I really must stop reading the Independent.
He's not "allowed" to say such things in America either, it would come under either the fighting words limitation to the first amendment or the incitement one (probably incitement I think)
However, the fact saying something may be deemed illegal doesn't make it possible to actually stop a person saying it in the first place.
Could you clarify what point you are trying to make with this question please?
However, the fact saying something may be deemed illegal doesn't make it possible to actually stop a person saying it in the first place.
Could you clarify what point you are trying to make with this question please?
What point are you trying to make, AoG, with your questions?
Yes he would be "allowed" to say such a thing on Twitter because what you tweet is not bounded by geographic borders - Had may well have found himself subject to a police investigation for incitement to kill however
As to the second story, about an alleged banning of black/asian workers in case Peres, the visiting Israeli dignitary might meet then - its unproven, unsubstantiated allegations at the moment, between union and management - think we might need to see a bit more evidence first - but I would hope we did not see any such crude and hyperbolic profiling measures employed here in the name of security
Yes he would be "allowed" to say such a thing on Twitter because what you tweet is not bounded by geographic borders - Had may well have found himself subject to a police investigation for incitement to kill however
As to the second story, about an alleged banning of black/asian workers in case Peres, the visiting Israeli dignitary might meet then - its unproven, unsubstantiated allegations at the moment, between union and management - think we might need to see a bit more evidence first - but I would hope we did not see any such crude and hyperbolic profiling measures employed here in the name of security
Don't know - was he being sarcastic - you'd have to hear to decide.
Expressing a genuine opinion as such would certainly be illegal in the UK, and I'd hope in the US.
I think there's a legal test of 'a moron in a hurry' regarding copyright
http:// en.wiki pedia.o rg/wiki /A_moro n_in_a_ hurry
Perhaps a similar test should be applied such that if a moron in a hurry would see that it was sarcasm then that would be a fair defence.
Expressing a genuine opinion as such would certainly be illegal in the UK, and I'd hope in the US.
I think there's a legal test of 'a moron in a hurry' regarding copyright
http://
Perhaps a similar test should be applied such that if a moron in a hurry would see that it was sarcasm then that would be a fair defence.
ChuckFickens
/// Could you clarify what point you are trying to make with this question please? ///
Hello Chuck nice to see you back.
Regarding your question, I was unaware that one had to make a point never mind clarifying it, I was merely entering a news story up for discussion, and I was not aware that one had always to make a point.
/// Could you clarify what point you are trying to make with this question please? ///
Hello Chuck nice to see you back.
Regarding your question, I was unaware that one had to make a point never mind clarifying it, I was merely entering a news story up for discussion, and I was not aware that one had always to make a point.
The title of this thread suggests that you do have some point. I'm curious what your own answer to the quesiton is, and whether or not you think he should be allowed to say such things. Because he has barely posted this it's possible that he will not be "allowed" - that is, prosecuted - to say it in the US either.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.