Insurance5 mins ago
Tuart Hall To Be Sued - What A Surprise
I did say a week or so back on this forum that many of these people who are bringing up old cases like Stuart Hall's case are doing it mainly to extract money from the "rich and famous".
Well here we have proof, a number of people are now going to sue Stuart Hall.
What next, adverts on TV saying "Been molested by a famous person- go to web site ive_been_molested.com - there is no win no fee".
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -englan d-22406 035
Well here we have proof, a number of people are now going to sue Stuart Hall.
What next, adverts on TV saying "Been molested by a famous person- go to web site ive_been_molested.com - there is no win no fee".
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by VHG. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Fred....
A body of rights, obligations, and remedies that is applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others.
That is quite clear and right when causation is established by the courts.
No argument there.
However in the case of Psychiatric evaluations, we, the lay people, cannot convince ourselves that the law, in these cases can differentiate the "wheat" from the "chaff".
No disrespect to the Law you understand and we, the laity, cannot think of a better system.
A body of rights, obligations, and remedies that is applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others.
That is quite clear and right when causation is established by the courts.
No argument there.
However in the case of Psychiatric evaluations, we, the lay people, cannot convince ourselves that the law, in these cases can differentiate the "wheat" from the "chaff".
No disrespect to the Law you understand and we, the laity, cannot think of a better system.
if you read a list of the charges, which he has admitted, this would be construed as sexual assault, whether then or now. why some continue on about the money, seem to miss the point entirely. That this man used his status, celebrity to lure often very girls and committed acts of indecency on them, against their will. The woman featured in the paper was offended, very upset by it, but chose not to pursue the matter years ago, because of what her father had told her, that they were nobodies and he was a somebody, a star, so who is going to believe a child? There is a lot of truth in that, particularly when you consider the time these events happened. Some get over it, some do not, to constantly assert that they are only after the money beggars belief. We have seen with the horrendous Jimmy Savile case and endless Catholic priests who abused their charges that many children won't be believed even if they did tell the authorities at the time. I for one think that the authorities will weed out those with no case to answer, and that those brave enough to come forward now, will at least perhaps get their day in court.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.