Selfishness is putting one's self before others. Which is certainly what anyone advocating "my body, my decision" is doing. Again, what about the consequences of those who knew you? Goodness only knows what it must be like for this woman's son. I have my own experiences to confirm some of what you said, particularly:
"...if you are feeling suicidal, you do not always consider all avenues open to you. that is just you in your rational mind thinking about somebody else's problems. it seems like the best solution at a particular point in your life."
Selfishness isn't necessarily a bad thing, though. At times in the past it was a necessary survival tactic. I don't see, though, that it is controversial to say that, in this case, there were better ways for her to have committed suicide. Or, that, it wasn't strictly speaking necessary.
And, therefore, to answer the question in the thread: it will not be abolished, and this case should not be used to judge that. I still think the new rules are ill-thought through, but this case is not a measure of that.