Crosswords1 min ago
Syrias Descent Into Madness
The whole conflict is becoming so barbaric. Its an unverified video source so its difficult to know just how much credence to place in the report - but Human Rights watch certainly believe its true - that one of the rebel commanders was filmed cutting our the heart of a dead soldier and biting into it.......
This is the very height of barbarism, and must surely be a war crime...
http:// edition .cnn.co m/2013/ 05/14/w orld/me ast/syr ia-eate n-heart /?hpt=h p_t1
This is the very height of barbarism, and must surely be a war crime...
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by LazyGun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.My immediate thought is that you get crazy people everywhere, take away their normal constraints such as during war time and worse still give them some power and you will always get perversions like this taking place. From this man, to the people who tortured people in WWII concentration camps, to Idid Amin's soldiers who pulled people apart with 2 cars to tyre burnings in South Africa as well as more historical abuses like US forces skinning slaughtered Indians in the ' Wild West', you will always get people who use the disorganisation of war to feed their own sickness. As long as this practice doesn't become widespread and I can't imagine it will, then I don't think we have anything more to worry about than any other horrific civil war that's taking place.
http:// www.cbs news.co m/8301- 503543_ 162-200 47873-5 03543/n ew-phot os-of-a trociti es-by-s oldiers -in-afg hanista n/
atrocities aren't new, or confined to weird foreigners
atrocities aren't new, or confined to weird foreigners
Not that it's exactly the done thing but I don't think descecrating the bodies of enemies falls into the same category of war crime as using white phosphorus on Hospitals or murdering civillians.
In a sense it's not dissimilar to this case (just more extreme) http:// en.wiki pedia.o rg/wiki /Video_ of_U.S. _Marine s_urina ting_on _Taliba n_fight ers
But IMHO we should reserve the tag 'war crime' for offenses against non-combatants
In a sense it's not dissimilar to this case (just more extreme) http://
But IMHO we should reserve the tag 'war crime' for offenses against non-combatants
Well, I rermain shocked at the barbarity of the action. I must be more sensitive than most.
And JNO, I am not quite sure who your response was directed at, or which specific reply, but if it were at me - Of course I know atrocities are not new, or confined to foreigners - was there anything in my post that suggests i didn't?
The greater crime is killing someone - loss of life is a greater tragedy, and despoiling a body must come second to that, and of course killing civilians ranks higher on the scale of what constitutes a war crime, but its not a term that is exclusive to civilians - never has been.
The action itself, the brutality of it, and the reports of what was said just demonstrate the level of viciousness and brutality to which this conflict has sunk.
And JNO, I am not quite sure who your response was directed at, or which specific reply, but if it were at me - Of course I know atrocities are not new, or confined to foreigners - was there anything in my post that suggests i didn't?
The greater crime is killing someone - loss of life is a greater tragedy, and despoiling a body must come second to that, and of course killing civilians ranks higher on the scale of what constitutes a war crime, but its not a term that is exclusive to civilians - never has been.
The action itself, the brutality of it, and the reports of what was said just demonstrate the level of viciousness and brutality to which this conflict has sunk.
LazyGun, I was just pointing out that "barbarism" isn't that uncommon. In the case of Afghanistan, though, they were (in this case) perpetrated by those - Americans - who don't even have anything personal at stake. At least in civil wars like Syria's, individual participants on both sides are fighting for themselves, their families, their tribes, their leaders, their politics. I'm not trying to defend it, but I think it's understandable.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.