ChatterBank1 min ago
Answers
We'd really prefer you didn't guess. We'd especially prefer you didn't guess correctly!
13:49 Mon 03rd Jun 2013
Yes, em. But she posted as if it were fact, not a guess, or a could be.
If Noddy, Big Ears and Golly were alive and well they could sue me if I said: Noddy, Big Ears and Golly enjoyed a threesome last week - ONLY if it were untrue AND damaged their reputation. If it were true, no sue. If all three were commonly known to be homosexual, inter-species lovers then no damage to reputation.
They could not sue me if I said: I think Noddy, Big Ears and Golly enjoyed a threesome last week.
If Noddy, Big Ears and Golly were alive and well they could sue me if I said: Noddy, Big Ears and Golly enjoyed a threesome last week - ONLY if it were untrue AND damaged their reputation. If it were true, no sue. If all three were commonly known to be homosexual, inter-species lovers then no damage to reputation.
They could not sue me if I said: I think Noddy, Big Ears and Golly enjoyed a threesome last week.
no idea if his surmise is accurate pusskin, but if it's the same stuff I've been watching, I'd be more convinced by the man's particular account of a sex tape's existence if he'd bothered to take the laundry and camping gear off the top of the wardrobe before he used his bedroom as a studio.
I really don't know why, but there you are.
I really don't know why, but there you are.
The Ed is being over-sensitive. I gave a suggestion of where to google - that does not imply complicity on AB's or my part as I have made no overt or invert suggestion to who has been nobbled on this.
The "journo" making the accusations (and strong that they are) had better be really sure on this one, for if he is wrong, then his legal bill is going to be massive - i.e through the roof.
I come back to the fact that the Mail may be looking to try to counter the noise that the Tel and the Times have captured recently......
The "journo" making the accusations (and strong that they are) had better be really sure on this one, for if he is wrong, then his legal bill is going to be massive - i.e through the roof.
I come back to the fact that the Mail may be looking to try to counter the noise that the Tel and the Times have captured recently......
DTC, your removed suggestion (which also matches the "not surprised at him but amazed at her", "he must have some charm", "sex tape" and "camping gear on the wardrobe" comments on this thread) does *not* match the names that I have seen. Your two names would indeed be explosive, but IMO they're the work of an attention-seeking nutjob.