Why is it that a lot of local authorities, when they find they have to economise, always seem to want to close care homes? I cannot believe that within their multi million pound budgets with all the waste incompetence that goes with it, they expect us to believe there aren't other areas that can't be cut that won't affect the vulnerable. I suspect it is more to do with making a political point, so they can blame the government and the 'savage cuts'.
I'm amazed there isn't enough money to provide services anyway what with the tax we pay in, and in light of the ability of past generations to supply services. I've lost all confidence in government at all levels to get it right, although I'm at a loss to know what or who to replace them with. They just seem to want to rip me off and provide as little as they can get away with.
Hardly surprising that Tory councils find more back end savings considering their over-lavish spending in those areas (e.g. Councillor expenses, Jollies, etc.).
and libraries, and rubbish and recycling collections, few bobbies on the beat, some of our fire stations are facing closure, not sure who is responsible but seems very foolhardy. i wonder sometimes what they do with all the revenue they do collect.
and ours is Labour run, they are more interested in promoting diversity in the community and providing literature in so many languages, no wonder they have to make cutbacks in crucial areas.
we get a booklet with a pie chart of expenditure, i am more interested in why they need so many big wigs and little wigs, not to mention a new building for their council people to the tune of 100 million quid. I have no idea if that is still going ahead, but it wouldn't surprise me.
Prices depends on whether it's a care home or a nursing home.
My nan who suffers with dementia is in a care home. Grandad who had mobility and health problems was in a nursing home. The difference was about £150 a week even though nans home was far superior.