Film, Media & TV3 mins ago
Elderly Asian Man Attacked.
52 Answers
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/n ews/art icle-23 95791/S hocking -moment -girl-k icks-el derly-A sian-ma n-80-gr ound-ca using-t urban-f all-spi tting-f ace.htm l
What is our country coming to when an eighty year old man cannot walk down the street, without being attacked by a member of the lower form of our present day youth?
Lets hope this woman, along with those who accompanied her, are soon arrested and made to pay for their crime, also what kind of person would stand videoing such a crime, instead of stopping this savage and brutal attack?
What is our country coming to when an eighty year old man cannot walk down the street, without being attacked by a member of the lower form of our present day youth?
Lets hope this woman, along with those who accompanied her, are soon arrested and made to pay for their crime, also what kind of person would stand videoing such a crime, instead of stopping this savage and brutal attack?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.whichever way one looks at this knife crime is still a serious matter, i read somewhere that hospitals do not always record those who come in with knife wounds, as a matter to be passed to the police, and those involved who may well get patched up, scarper before the police arrive, if it is reported by the hospital.
interesting, if you read down it does say hospitals do not have to report knife crime, so figures can be inaccurate..
http:// www.the guardia n.com/u k/datab log/201 2/apr/1 2/londo n-knife -crime
http://
hc4361
My, first Fred accuses me of putting down something that was totally incorrect (which surprise, surprise, he failed to address) and now you have come up with this from somewhere.
/// Fred, AOG has already explained the Ed altered the question title. ///
I didn't say anything of the kind.
FredPuli43
This is what I said, but I don't know why I continuously find the need to explain myself, but then I suppose it does highlight how you continuously get the wrong end of the stick.
/// This is a sub editors licence to create a headline that will get noticed by the maximum number of people, ///
Part of a sub editors job is to create a headline which will get noticed by the maximum number of people, I was merely explaining that I was acting the part of a sub editor by creating a headline to my thread that would attract the most attention.
I have nothing against yourself and others coming out in opposition to myself, but please stick to what is said, instead of making things up in your failed attempts to belittle me.
My, first Fred accuses me of putting down something that was totally incorrect (which surprise, surprise, he failed to address) and now you have come up with this from somewhere.
/// Fred, AOG has already explained the Ed altered the question title. ///
I didn't say anything of the kind.
FredPuli43
This is what I said, but I don't know why I continuously find the need to explain myself, but then I suppose it does highlight how you continuously get the wrong end of the stick.
/// This is a sub editors licence to create a headline that will get noticed by the maximum number of people, ///
Part of a sub editors job is to create a headline which will get noticed by the maximum number of people, I was merely explaining that I was acting the part of a sub editor by creating a headline to my thread that would attract the most attention.
I have nothing against yourself and others coming out in opposition to myself, but please stick to what is said, instead of making things up in your failed attempts to belittle me.
AOG, I get it. When you choose the words for the heading to your OP, they are not words that you would use and not words you think relevant , but words which you imagine a sub-editor of a tabloid would use. .
Obviously your imagination of what others would put is responsible. Well that explains my answers to you then. It wasn't you being condemned by of your own words, but you being condemned by what you imagine someone else's words would be.
Obviously your imagination of what others would put is responsible. Well that explains my answers to you then. It wasn't you being condemned by of your own words, but you being condemned by what you imagine someone else's words would be.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.