ChatterBank4 mins ago
Coward!
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jd_1984. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Are we really going to gloat over the death of this inidividual?
I would not want for one moment to diminish the seriousness of his crimes, or the lifetime of suffering he has caused but -
in a civilised society, the law passes sentence, and the sentence is completed - in this case by natural death.
It is no kind of 'victory' or 'justice' that this man has died prematurely - just another sad chapter in a tragic situation.
I would not want for one moment to diminish the seriousness of his crimes, or the lifetime of suffering he has caused but -
in a civilised society, the law passes sentence, and the sentence is completed - in this case by natural death.
It is no kind of 'victory' or 'justice' that this man has died prematurely - just another sad chapter in a tragic situation.
Oh, look at that. Youngmafbog using another death to score a pathetic political point!
The man has escaped his punishment now, that's nothing to be celebrated, although I won't shed a single tear over his passing either. But the job of a good prison is to see that a sentence is served. The prison wardens signally failed to do so now that he has been able to kill himself.
The man has escaped his punishment now, that's nothing to be celebrated, although I won't shed a single tear over his passing either. But the job of a good prison is to see that a sentence is served. The prison wardens signally failed to do so now that he has been able to kill himself.
If you mean "do I support the Death Penalty?", no, I don't. For that matter the sentence given to Ariel Castro was pretty pointless. Life with no parole is all he can serve, so why add the thousand years on top of that? If it was meant to be a statement it's a pretty pointless one, given that you can never serve more than life by definition. I thought it was silly.
In the US system they do not add N years on top they merely give out the sentence by totting up the senetences for the offences. Human longevity is not relevant to that. Unlike the UK they rarely use concurrent sentencing that's why it's not uncommon to see many hundreds of years sentencing. We could learn something here, 368 burgalries at 6 months each? that's 184 years with 50% off for good behaviour!.
-- answer removed --