Death Of Three Young Ladies Backpacking...
News4 mins ago
Gove: Mail Was Right To Offend
50 Answers
Dear oh dear.
http://
Just doesn't get it does he? This idiot gets further detached from reality day by day. But given Dacre's reputation I suppose he foolishly believes he feels he has to defend a daily sh*t-sheet that his wife writes for, despite all from the PM down saying the paper was wrong.
http://
Just doesn't get it does he? This idiot gets further detached from reality day by day. But given Dacre's reputation I suppose he foolishly believes he feels he has to defend a daily sh*t-sheet that his wife writes for, despite all from the PM down saying the paper was wrong.
Answers
/who presume to be so against any personal insults such as in this case. / Pray explain how a national newspaper lying about and misrepresent
15:07 Wed 02nd Oct 2013
-- answer removed --
Many people don't realise that Peter Dacre was a vital part of the war effort based partly in Bletchley Park and partly in a knocking shop off Old Compton Street
His showbiz gossip column contained cleverly encoded instructions for his avid Resistance Fighter readers in Occupied Europe.
Most notably, his June 1944 Review of 'No, No Nanette' starring Zasu Pitts included detailed deployment instructions for the Normandy Landings.
He was awarded the VC (vodka cocktail) with Bar in 1945.
His son should be very proud.
His showbiz gossip column contained cleverly encoded instructions for his avid Resistance Fighter readers in Occupied Europe.
Most notably, his June 1944 Review of 'No, No Nanette' starring Zasu Pitts included detailed deployment instructions for the Normandy Landings.
He was awarded the VC (vodka cocktail) with Bar in 1945.
His son should be very proud.
Yet another assumption, when you can't possible know he is "currying favour with his bosses wife".
----------------------------
Like your assumption that I was a card-carrying pinko 5th columnist that was 180 degrees wide of the mark you mean?
Different editor but same stable, doesn't the Mail On Sunday's apology today for their most recent faux pas make Gove look even more foolish, given that he said there was no need for an apology over the first outrage, that even Heseltine called a hatchet job?
----------------------------
Like your assumption that I was a card-carrying pinko 5th columnist that was 180 degrees wide of the mark you mean?
Different editor but same stable, doesn't the Mail On Sunday's apology today for their most recent faux pas make Gove look even more foolish, given that he said there was no need for an apology over the first outrage, that even Heseltine called a hatchet job?
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
AOG, it could be that Ralph Miliband was forced to join up and you haven't read anywhere that he wasn't. Well, then read on:
The man wasn't a British citizen until 1946, merely a foreigner in Britain. He could not have been forced to join up in the War. He served in a Belgian unit of the Royal Navy.[Source Wikipedia "Ralph Miliband"]
But saying Dacre's father was deficient in some way is just as bad as saying Ed Miliband's father was, when the intent is to cast a slur on the son.
The man wasn't a British citizen until 1946, merely a foreigner in Britain. He could not have been forced to join up in the War. He served in a Belgian unit of the Royal Navy.[Source Wikipedia "Ralph Miliband"]
But saying Dacre's father was deficient in some way is just as bad as saying Ed Miliband's father was, when the intent is to cast a slur on the son.
Just seen this on the BBC website...seems that the DM has few friends now.
http://
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.